公共政策领域程序公正补偿效应:不确定性的调节作用

The Compensation Effect of Procedural Justice in the Field of Public Policy: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty

本研究在公共政策领域,通过Scenario方法和问卷调查法相结合,研究不确定性对程序公正和结果宜人性对公共政策可接受性交互作用的调节作用,同时进一步探究两个不同来源的不确定性即信息不确定性和自我不确定性对程序公正、结果宜人性交互作用的影响。研究一的结果表明:程序公正和结果宜人性对公共政策接受性有交互作用,而不确定性对其起调节作用。不确定性高时,程序公正和结果宜人性对公共政策可接受性的交互作用更显著,程序公正可以缓解不利结果带来的消极影响。不确定性低时,程序公正和结果宜人性对公共政策可接受性的交互作用不显著。研究二的结果表明:信息不确定性和自我不确定性对这种交互作用存在不同的调节作用。

This study, in the field of public policy, combines the Scenario method and questionnaire survey method to investigate the moderating effect of uncertainty on the interaction between procedural justice and outcome favorability on the acceptance of public policy. Additionally, it further explores the impact of two different sources of uncertainty, namely information uncertainty and self-uncertainty, on the interaction between procedural justice and outcome favorability. The results of Study 1 indicate that procedural justice and outcome favorability interact to affect the acceptance of public policy, with uncertainty playing a moderating role. When uncertainty is high, the interaction between procedural justice and outcome favorability is more significant in influencing the acceptability of public policies, with procedural justice mitigating the negative impact of unfavorable outcomes. However, when uncertainty is low, the interaction between procedural justice and outcome favorability on the acceptability of public policies is not significant. The results of Study 2 suggest that information uncertainty and self-uncertainty have different moderating effects on this interaction.