童年期心理虐待与青少年攻击行为的关系研究

A Study on the Relationship between Childhood Psychological Abuse and Adolescent Aggressive Behavior

目的:探究童年期心理虐待与青少年攻击行为的关系。方法:采用整群抽样法对沅陵县某中学学生发放儿童心理虐待量表和Buss-Warren攻击性问卷,回收有效问卷602份。结果:1) 童年期心理虐待与青少年攻击行为在性别、是否单亲上差异显著(p p > 0.05);2) 童年期遭受心理虐待的青少年与没有遭受心理虐待的青少年在攻击行为上存在显著差异(p p p > 0.05),童年期心理虐待各维度与青少年攻击行为各维度呈显著正相关(p Objective: Exploring the relationship between childhood psychological abuse and adolescent aggressive behavior. Methods: The Child Psychological Abuse Scale and the Buss-Warren Aggression Questionnaire were administered to students of a middle school in Yuanling County using the whole population sampling method, and 602 valid questionnaires were collected. Results: 1) There were significant differences between psychological abuse in childhood and adolescent aggression in terms of gender and whether or not they were single parents (p p > 0.05);2) Adolescents who had been psychologically abused in childhood differed significantly from those who hadn’t been psychologically abused in terms of their aggression (p p p > 0.05). Conclusion: 1) Psychological abuse suffered by adolescents is dominated by forms of intimidation, while the aggressive behaviors displayed are mostly hostile;2) Adolescents who suffered psychological abuse during childhood are more likely to display aggressive behaviors relative;3) The more complex the form of psychological abuse suffered, the more complicated the forms of aggressive behaviors, and adolescents who suffered from intimidation, degradation, neglect, and interference are more likely to display hostility, and adolescents who suffered indulgence were more likely to show physical aggression;4) Girls who suffered psychological abuse in childhood were more likely to show aggression, and adolescents from single-parent families showed more aggression compared to adolescents from non-single-parent families;5) Psychological abuse in childhood had a significant positive predictive effect on adolescents’ aggression, and dimensions of psychological abuse had significant positive predictive effects on physical aggression, indirect aggression, anger had significant positive predictive effects, and the dimensions except connivance had significant positive predictive effects on verbal aggression and hostility.