期刊文献+

行政审批制度改革影响了企业慈善捐赠吗?——基于行政审批中心设立的“准自然实验”

Has the Reform of Administrative Examination and Approval System Affected Corporate Charitable Donations?—Based on the “Quasi Natural Experiment” Established by the Administrative Examination and Approval Center
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以各地级行政审批中心的设立为“准自然实验”,基于1998~2016年企业慈善捐赠数据以及地级行政审批中心设立数据,利用双重差分法(DID)研究了行政审批中心的设立是否能够增加企业慈善捐赠额。研究发现,上市公司所在地设立行政审批中心后,企业慈善捐赠额显著提升,并且行政审批中心的设立对企业慈善捐赠的影响作用具有持续性,且设立时间越长作用越明显。随后,进一步考察行政审批改革影响企业慈善捐赠的内在机制,发现行政审批中心的进驻事项越多,这种影响越显著。异质性分析发现,较于国有企业,行政审批改革对民营企业慈善捐赠的影响更为明显。本文从行政审批制度改革视角,丰富和补充了制度变化和微观主体行为决策的相关研究。 Taking the establishment of various prefecture level administrative examination and approval centers as the “quasi natural experiment”, based on the data of corporate charitable donations from 1998 to 2016 and the establishment data of prefecture level administrative examination and approval centers, this paper studies whether the establishment of administrative examination and approval centers can increase the amount of corporate charitable donations by using the double difference method (DID). The study found that after the establishment of the administrative examination and approval center in the location of the listed company, the amount of corporate charitable donations increased significantly, and the establishment of the administrative examination and approval center has a continuous impact on corporate charitable donations, and the longer the establishment time, the more obvious the effect is. Then, we further investigate the internal mechanism of the impact of administrative examination and approval reform on corporate charitable donation, and find that the more the administrative examination and approval center is stationed, the more significant the impact is. Heterogeneity analysis found that compared with state-owned enterprises, the impact of administrative examination and approval reform on charitable donations of private enterprises is more obvious. From the perspective of administrative examination and approval system reform, this paper enriches and supplements the relevant research on system change and micro subject behavior decision-making.
作者 赵苑
机构地区 重庆大学
出处 《社会科学前沿》 2022年第2期374-383,共10页 Advances in Social Sciences
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献71

  • 1钟宏武.企业捐赠作用的综合解析[J].中国工业经济,2007(2):75-83. 被引量:143
  • 2周黎安 李宏彬 陈烨.《相对绩效考核:中国地方官员晋升机制的一项经验研究》[J].经济学报,2005,1.
  • 3樊纲,王小鲁.《中国市场化指数--各地区市场化相对进程2011年报告》,经济科学出版社2011年出版.
  • 4Bennett,R. , 1998, " Corporate philanthropy in France, Germany and the UK: International comparisons of commercial orientation Towards Company Giving in European Nations", International Marketing Review, 15, 458-475.
  • 5Cooper, M. J. , H. Gulen,and A. V. Ovtehinnikov, 2010, "Corporate Political Contributions and Stock Returns", Journal of Finance,65,687-724.
  • 6Denis, D. ,and D. Denis, 1995, "Performance Changes Following Top Management Dismissals" , Journal of Finance 50,1029-1057.
  • 7Durnev, A. , 2010, "The Real Effects of Plotical Uncertainty: Elections and Investment Sensitivity to Stock Prices", London School of Economics and Political Science, Woking Paper.
  • 8Gan, A. , 2006, "The Impact of Public Scrutiny on Corporate Philanthropy", Journal of Business Ethics, 69 (3) ,217-236.
  • 9Jones, B. ,and B. Olken, " Do Leaders Matter? National Leadership and Growth since World WarlI", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2005, 120 ( 3 ) , 835-864.
  • 10Julio, B. ,and Y. Yook, 2012, "Political Uncertainty and Corporate Investment Cycles", Journal of Finance,67,45-83.

共引文献509

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部