期刊文献+

浅论故意伤害罪的认定标准之修正

On the Revision of the Cognizance Standard of Intentional Injury Crime
下载PDF
导出
摘要 毋庸置疑,理论和实践中认为对故意伤害罪保护法益为身体完整性和“轻伤”为定罪依据。然而,揆诸现实,法益内容逐渐精神化以及现实情况变化,故意伤害罪的保护法益亟需增加精神伤害为本罪保护法益之一。故意伤害具有频发性、犯罪成本较低;轻微伤害危害程度不亚于财产类、侵犯名誉类犯罪;国外惩罚故意伤害较为严厉,基于此,轻微伤害理应纳入故意伤害罪。 Undoubtedly, in theory and practice, it is believed that the protection of legal interests for the crime of intentional injury is based on physical integrity and “minor injury”. However, due to the fact that the content of legal interests is gradually spiritualized and the changes in the reality, the protection of legal interests in the crime of intentional injury urgently needs to increase mental injury as one of the protection of legal interests in this crime. Intentional injury is frequent and the crime cost is low. The harm degree of minor injury is no less than that of property and reputation crimes. In foreign countries, the punishment of intentional injury is relatively severe. Based on this, minor injury should be included in the crime of intentional injury.
出处 《社会科学前沿》 2022年第9期3736-3741,共6页 Advances in Social Sciences
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献39

  • 1刘宪权,陆一敏.猥亵儿童罪司法认定疑难问题分析[J].青少年犯罪问题,2020(4):5-14. 被引量:19
  • 2孙东东,刘克鑫.论精神伤害的司法精神医学鉴定[J].中外法学,1994,6(4):42-44. 被引量:7
  • 3[日]平野龙一.《刑法总论Ⅱ》[M].东京:有斐阁,1975年版.第216页.
  • 4张明楷.《刑法学》(第二版)[M].法律出版社,2003年版.第731页.
  • 5张明楷.法益初论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.172.
  • 6(英)休谟 关文运译.人性论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1980.23.
  • 7[日]西田典之:《刑法各论》(第三版),弘文堂2005年,第443页
  • 8[日]中村勉.《刑法各论要义Ⅰ》,北树出版社1998年版,第85,93-95页.
  • 9[俄]斯库拉托夫等主编.《俄罗斯联邦刑法典释义》(上),黄道秀译,中国政法大学出版社2000年版,第303页.
  • 10[日]大谷实.《刑法讲义各论》,成文堂2002年版,第33—34页.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部