期刊文献+

高校学生组织公平感状况及其教育启示

College Students’ Sense of Organizational Justice and Its Educational Enlightenment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨高校学生组织公平感现状,拓展现阶段高校管理育人思路。方法:采用自编高校学生的组织公平感问卷对450名在校生进行调研。结果:高校学生组织公平感水平中等(3.1~3.43之间),包括分配公平感、程序公平感和互动公平感三个维度;大一学生的组织公平感水平最高,大四学生最低,年级因素在学生的程序公平感和互动公平感维度上存在显著差异;城镇生源学生的组织公平感水平高于农村生源;学生的组织公平感水平随获奖助学金次数增加而降低;学生干部的组织公平感得分均值均大于非学生干部。结论:性别、年级、生源地、获得奖助学金次数、是否学生干部等是学生组织公平感水平重要的客观影响因素,在高校管理育人实践中需要注意学生差异化教育。 Objective: To explore the current situation of organizational justice of college students, so as to enrich the current college management and education ideas. Methods: A survey of 450 college students was conducted with a self-designed questionnaire on organizational justice. Results: The score of college students’ sense of organizational justice is medium (Between 3.1 to 3.43) and it includes three dimensions: distributive justice, procedural justice and interactive justice. College freshmen have the highest sense of organizational justice and seniors have scored lowest;Grade factor has significant difference in procedural justice and interactive justice;The score of organizational justice of urban students is higher than that of rural students;The perceived organizational justice decreased with the increase of the number of awards;The average score of perceived organizational justice of student cadres is higher than that of non-student cadres. Conclusion: Gender, grade, place of origin, number of awards and grants, and whether students are leaders are important objective factors influencing students’ sense of organizational justice. It is necessary to pay attention to students’ differentiated education in the practice of college management and education.
作者 袁战阳
出处 《社会科学前沿》 2023年第9期5119-5126,共8页 Advances in Social Sciences
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献53

  • 1Adams, S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
  • 2Adams, S. (1965). lnequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp.267-299). New York: Academic Press. Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a Generalism Strain. Theory of Crime and Delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47-88.
  • 3Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on Negotiations in Organizations. (pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT JAI Press.
  • 4Cohen, R. L., & Greenberg, J. (1982). The justice concept in socialpsychology. In J. Greenberg, & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior, (pp. 1-41). New York: Academic Press.
  • 5Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3), 425-445.
  • 6Colquitt, J. A., & Greenberg, J. (2003). Organizational justice: A fair assessment of the state of the literature. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior : The state of the science (2nd ed.). (pp. 165-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • 7Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? An historical overview. In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice. (pp. 3-58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • 8French, W, (1964). The personnel management process: Human resources administration. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • 9Frohlich, N. (2007). A very short history of distributive justice. Social Justice Research, 20, 250-262.
  • 10Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12, 9-22.

共引文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部