家庭内部暴力受害者的极端自卫行为评析——跨文化与法律体系的比较研究

Analysis of Extreme Self-Defense Actions by Victims of Domestic Violence—A Comparative Study across Cultures and Legal Systems

家庭内部暴力下受害者可能采取极端自卫措施,包括在长期遭受暴力的情况下杀害施暴者的争议性行为。深入分析了正当防卫和紧急避险等法律概念在为受害者提供法律保护方面的应用,及其与现实情境的契合度问题,指出了在不同文化和法律体系中这些概念的适用性和争议点。同时通过对罗马法系、英美法系以及中国大陆法律体系的比较,展示了各自在处理家庭内部暴力导致的极端自卫行为时的不同策略和面临的挑战。各法律体系在如何平衡保护受害者权益与维护法律正义之间,也存在着明显的差异。最终研究呼吁开展国际合作和法律改革,尝试探寻普适性的公共政策和刑法出罪路径,为受家庭内暴力影响的受害者提供足够的法律支持和社会理解。

Victims under domestic violence may resort to extreme self-defense measures, including the contentious act of killing the aggressor after enduring prolonged abuse. This analysis delves into the application of legal concepts such as justified self-defense and necessity in providing legal protection to victims, along with their alignment with actual situations, highlighting the applicability and disputes of these concepts across diverse cultural and legal frameworks. Through a comparative study of the Roman law system, the Anglo-American legal system, and China's Mainland’s legal framework, the distinct strategies and challenges faced by each in addressing extreme self-defense actions resulting from domestic violence are illustrated. Significant differences exist among these legal systems in balancing the protection of victims’ rights with the maintenance of legal justice. The research concludes with a call for international cooperation and legal reforms to explore universal public policies and criminal law pathways, aiming to provide adequate legal support and societal understanding for victims affected by domestic violence.