人教版与浙教版“反比例函数”的对比分析

Comparative Analysis of the Inverse Proportion Function between People’s Education Press and Zhejiang Education Press

由于地域不同,数学教科书的特色也不同,因此数学教科书的横向比较是当下研究的一个焦点。本文通过比较研究法和定量分析,对人民教育出版社和浙江教育出版社出版的两版初中数学教材(分别简称人教版和浙教版)中“反比例函数”的章节编排、概念引入、图像和性质、例题及习题的设置、章末小结等方面进行比较,探讨了两个版本教材的异同点。通过对两版本教材的比较分析发现两版本教材关于反比例函数和二次函数章节的编排顺序有所不同;人教版注重类比,浙教版注重归纳;浙教版的习题数量远远大于人教版;二者都有自我评价的部分,但人教版更强调知识点之间的联系。Due to regional differences, the characteristics of mathematics textbooks also vary, so horizontal comparison of mathematics textbooks is a focus of current research. This article uses comparative research and quantitative analysis to compare the chapter arrangement, concept introduction, images and properties, setting of examples and exercises, and summary at the end of the chapters of the inverse proportion function in two versions of junior high school mathematics textbooks published by People’s Education Press and Zhejiang Education Press (referred to as People’s Education Press and Zhejiang Education Press respectively), and explores the similarities and differences between the two versions of textbooks. Through comparative analysis of the two versions of textbooks, it was found that the arrangement order of the chapters on inverse proportional function and quadratic function in the two versions of textbooks is different;the People’s Education Press emphasizes analogy, while the Zhejiang Education Press emphasizes induction;the number of exercises in Zhejiang Education Press is much larger than that in People’s Education Press;both have a self-evaluation section, but the People’s Education Press emphasizes the connection between knowledge points more.