摘要
朱子对先天八卦与《河图》关系的论说体现在“则图画卦”之理中,但所论稍逊周详。后学胡方平、熊禾接续对卦、图关系之探讨。胡氏细解朱子“析合补空”之义,依循特定理路,将卦、图合而为一;熊氏则巧借朱子交易之说,以“阴阳相交”统贯于卦画阴阳与《河图》之数的分置对照中。经由对“西南易位”的各样开解,二儒大抵实现卦、图内在理路之融通。二儒之论瑕瑜互见,若置于元初这一特定历史语境下,其意义应一分为二地看待。
Zhu Xi’s theory on the relationship between the primordial eight trigrams and He Tu was embodied in the theory of “drawing trigrams by imitating Tu”, but his theory was a little less detailed. Hu Fangping and Xiong He continued to discuss the relationship between hexagrams and “Tu”. Hu Fangping carefully explained Zhu Xi’s theory of “separating and filling”, and combined hexagram and “Tu” into one according to a specific logical path. Xiong He, with the help of Zhu Zi’s theory of interchangeability, used the “intersection of Yin and Yang” running through the contrast between Yin and Yang in the hexagrams and the num-ber of He Tu. Through various interpretations of “south and west translocation”, the two scholars roughly realized the harmony of hexagrams and “Tu” based on internal logic. The theory of the two scholars has both strong and weak points, its significance should be viewed in two ways under the specific historical context of the early Yuan Dynasty.
出处
《国学(汉斯)》
2022年第3期96-103,共8页
Chinese Traditional Culture