摘要
近年来文学期刊研究常和“公共空间”理论结合在一起,以政治的严苛/宽松判断刊物“公共空间”塑造的成功与否,这样的视角容易遮蔽文学期刊本身的刊物倾向。因此,本文通过对商业策略下1930年代《现代》杂志编辑理念、批评实践等方面的分析,发现在商业运营目的的引领下,《现代》以参与主体的多元化、批评空间的“灰色化”尝试塑造“公共空间”下的“文学公共空间”,呈现出兼容并蓄、独立自由的文化品格。而在此过程中,它并非是“去政治化”的,相反,“文艺”与“政治”曲径通幽的追求为《现代》杂志塑造文化品格带来了张力与限度。
In recent years, literary journal research has often been combined with the theory of “public space”, using political rigor/leniency to judge the success of shaping the “public space” of publications. This perspective can easily obscure the publication tendency of literary journals themselves. Therefore, this article analyzes the editorial philosophy and critical practice of Modern magazine in the 1930s under commercial strategies, and finds that under the guidance of commercial operation purposes, Modern attempts to shape the “literary public space” under the “public space” by diversifying its participants and graying out its critical space, presenting an inclusive, independent and free cultural character. In this process, it is not “depoliticized”. On the contrary, the pursuit of “literature and art” and “politics” has brought tension and limitations to the shaping of cultural character in Modern magazine.
出处
《国学(汉斯)》
2023年第4期473-480,共8页
Chinese Traditional Culture