开启评审专家解决工程疑难案件的新趋势

Open a New Trend of Evaluation Expert Solving the Difficult Project Cases

为了解决灾后重建中政府部门与承建方产生的争议,采用专家评审的方式是除了仲裁和诉讼之外的一种有效的替代性纠纷解决机制。合同争议双方与评审专家签订了委托协议书,评审组成员通过现场调查、询问、查阅原始证据材料等方式了解工程存在着重大设计变更、平行发包等问题,专家评审组做出了按实结算工程价款,以承包公司为总承包方并由其承担责任等建议。专家评审解决争议的方式仍然存在一些局限,为此应该组成《评审员名册》,放开各地专家背景资料,扩大评审组,并建议仲裁庭对于工程复杂疑难案件先行召集专家评审小组对争议进行专业方面定性,而后对定量部分自由裁量。

The evaluation of experts is an effective alternative method except for litigation and arbitration to solve the dispute between government departments and contractors in the post-disaster recon-struction. Both sides in the dispute signed a commission agreement with evaluation experts. The members of the review group came to know that there existed a series of problems of major design changes and parallel contracts in the project by the field investigation, inquiry, consulting the original evidence material. The review group made their suggestions of settling account according to practical fees and taking contractor as the general contractor and responsible party. There are limitations of the method of expert review solving the disputes, so the government should set up a reviewer list, release the background information of experts around the country, expand the re-viewer group, and the arbitral court should summon reviewer group to conduct professional qua-litative research before the court exercising discretion in the quantitative part.