平台封禁问题的法律适用困境

The Legal Application Dilemma of Platform Blockade

学术界对于平台封禁问题存在两种法律适用路径,一种主张认为可通过《反不正当竞争法》中的互联网专条对其进行不正当竞争的违法认定,另一种主张则认为平台封禁行为具有排除、限制竞争效果,故而应适用《反垄断法》对其进行规制。在理论上,两者的位阶关系和交叉关系较为模糊。在司法实践中,平台封禁问题也尚未出现一个较为统一的规制方法。在两部法律存在交叉的情况下,依此对理论层面和实践层面存在的法律适用困境进行分析讨论,在明确问题后结合域外法经验,提出应然对策。

There are two legal application pathsfor platform blockade in academic circles. One is that the illegaldetermination of unfair competition can be carried out through the Internet-specificarticles in the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, and the other is that platformblockade has the effect of eliminating and restricting competition, so itshould be regulated by the Anti-monopoly Law. In theory, the rank relationshipand cross relationship between the two are relatively vague. In judicialpractice, there has not yet been a relatively unified regulation method forplatform blockade. In the case of the overlap between the two laws, this paperanalyzes and discusses the legal application dilemma at the theoretical leveland the practical level, and proposes appropriate countermeasures based on theexperience of extraterritorial law after clarifying the problem.