证明妨碍规则在知识产权证据保全中的适用

The Application of the Proof of Obstruction Rule in Intellectual Property Evidence Preservation

《知识产权证据规定》创设性地对知识产权中妨碍证据保全的行为提出了“承担不利后果”的私法效果,具有进步意义。但由于法条表述不明确,为保障证明妨碍规则的适用,仍需要从构成要件与法律效果两个层面予以明确。因此本文主要针对知识产权证据保全中的证明妨碍规则阐述客观要件的构成,并探讨主体要件的扩展。并分析采用以“推定证据所涉证明事项成立”为原则的多元法律效果的合理性。

The “Provisions on IntellectualProperty Evidence” creatively puts forward the private law effect of “sufferingadverse consequences” for behaviors that hinder evidence preservation inintellectual property rights, which is of progressive significance. However,due to the unclear expression of the law, itstill needs to be clarified from the two aspects of constituent elementsand legal effect, so as to ensure the application of the proof of obstructionof the rules. Therefore, this paper mainly focuses on the proof obstructionrules in intellectual property evidence preservation, expounds the compositionof the objective elements, and discusses the extension of the main elements. Italso analyzes the rationality of adopting the principle of multiple legaleffects based on the principle of “presumably the evidence involved in theevidence is established”.