期刊文献+

国际投资中一般例外条款分析——以新冠疫情防控措施为例

Analysis of General Exception Clauses in International Investment—A Case Study of COVID-19 Prevention and Control Measures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2019年新冠肺炎疫情的大流行影响了全世界人民的生命健康,同时对国际投资的发展提出了新的挑战。面对东道国所采取的强制停工停产、征收征用等疫情防控措施,越来越多的投资者可能会基于违反相关的国际投资协定义务相继提起投资仲裁,使得国家面临严重的仲裁危机。国际投资机制长久以来便维持着保护投资的趋势,使得东道国的公共健康抗辩异常难得,其中一般例外条款的设置和适用尤其重要。本文希望通过对一般例外条款的深入分析,更好应对我国目前及未来可能面临的投资仲裁请求,发挥一般例外条款在平衡投资者利益与东道国规制权之间关系的作用。 The COVID-19 pandemic in 2019 hasaffected the lives and health of people all over the world, while posing newchallenges to the development of international investment. In the face of thehost country’s epidemic prevention and control measures such as compulsorysuspension of production, expropriation and requisition, more and moreinvestors may initiate investment arbitration based on the violation of obligationsunder relevant international investment agreements, making the country face aserious arbitration crisis. The international investment mechanism has longmaintained the trend of protecting investment, which makes the host country’spublic health defense extremely rare, among which the establishment andapplication of the general exception clause is particularly important. Thispaper hopes to better deal with China’s current and future investmentarbitration claims through in-depth analysis of the general exception clause,and play the role of the general exception clause in balancing the relationshipbetween the interests of investors and the host country’s regulatory rights.
作者 李媛
出处 《争议解决》 2022年第3期458-462,共5页 Dispute Settlement
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献121

  • 1韩秀丽.论比例原则在有关征收的国际投资仲裁中的开创性适用[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2008(6):116-123. 被引量:15
  • 2余劲松.外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J].法商研究,2005,22(6):41-48. 被引量:37
  • 3黄志雄.WTO自由贸易与公共道德第一案——安提瓜诉美国网络赌博服务争端评析[J].法学评论,2006,24(2):122-128. 被引量:16
  • 4LG&E Energy Corp. et al. v The Republic of Argentina. ICSID ease no. ARB/02/1 (2006) ;Continental Casualty Company v The Argentine Republic. ICSID case no. ARB/O3/gA, award of 5 September 2008.
  • 5See Anthea Roberts, Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States, 104 Am. J. Int' l. L. 179 (2010).
  • 6See William W. Burke -White & Andreas yon Stadan, Investment Protection in Extraordinary Time: The Interpretation and Application of Nort - Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties, 48 Va. J. Int' l L. (2008) 307, 376 - 81.
  • 7Id., 320-324,.
  • 8CMS Gas Transmission Company v The Argentine Republic, ICSID case no. ARB/01/08, 12) (annulment proceeding). Decision of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, 25 September 2007, para. 128 - 136.
  • 9Sempra Energy International v The Argentine Republic. ICSID case no. ARB/02/16 ( Annulment Proceeding), Decision on the Argentine Re- public' s Request for Annulment of the Award, 29 June 2010.
  • 10See Anne van Aakenand Jurgen Kurtz, Prudence or Discrimination? Emergency Measures, The Global Financial Crisis and International Economic Law, 12 J. Int' l Econ. L. 859 (2009).

共引文献171

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部