摘要
“严重污染环境”在污染环境罪中扮演着十分重要的角色,但是司法解释的偏差使得该罪出现行为与结果并存的二元入罪标准,引发了行为犯与结果犯、危险犯与实害犯等问题的讨论。关于污染环境罪的争议问题应当从该罪的法益着手,坚持生态学的人类中心法益观,对法益进行前置化保护。判断“严重污染环境”时应当统一认定方式,坚持行为标准,将结果作为结果加重犯处理,同时以抽象危险犯为本罪的基本形态,保留司法解释中的兜底性条款。
“Seriously polluting the envi-ronment” plays a very important role in the crime of environmental pollution, but the deviation of judicial interpretation makes the dual incrimination standard of the crime of behavior and result coexist, which leads to the discussion of the problem of behavior crime and result crime, dangerous crime and actual harm crime. The controversy about the crime of environmental pollution should start from the legal interests of the crime, adhere to the anthropocentric view of ecological legal in-terests, pre-protection of legal interests. When judging “seriously polluted environment”, he should unify the identification way, adhere to the standard of behavior, treat the result as the result ag-gravated crime, and take abstract dangerous crime as the basic form of this crime, and retain the provision of the bottom of the judicial interpretation.
出处
《争议解决》
2022年第3期564-570,共7页
Dispute Settlement