论法律不能与禁止性规定的适用关系

On the Application of Legal Impossibility of Performance and Prohibitive Regulations

现行法和学说未关注法律不能与禁止性规定的适用关系。若通过法律不能制度即可实现禁止性规定的规范目的,则无无效之必要。通过比较禁止性规定和法律不能的适用范围,归纳二者适用范围的交集。区分事实上是否履行,适用违法无效的规制进路和法律不能制度的法律效果不尽相同。优先适用法律不能制度较之违法无效进路能有效维护私法自治、防范违法行为、符合法律规定。

Current laws and doctrines do not pay attention to the application of legal impossibility of perfor-mance and prohibitive regulations. If the normative purpose of the prohibitive regulations can be achieved through the legal impossibility, there is no need to be invalid. By comparing the scope of application of prohibitive regulations and legal impossibility, the intersection of the scope of appli-cation of the two is summarized. To distinguish whether it has actually been performed, the legal effects of applying the prohibitive regulations and legal impossibility are not similar. Compared with the legal impossibility approach, applying the prohibitive regulations can effectively maintain the autonomy of private law, prevent illegal acts, and comply with legal regulations, so it is more le-gitimate.