期刊文献+

欧盟宽恕制度的沿革及对我国的启示

The Evolution of the EU Forgiveness System and Its Enlightenment to China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 卡特尔作为对市场自由竞争危害最严重的行为,不仅会损害消费者的利益,甚至会破坏一国的市场经济自由和公平竞争的市场环境。我国由于对卡特尔宽恕制度的立法相较于美国、欧盟等国家启动较晚,法规较不完善,且尚未形成丰富的实践经验。欧盟委员会先后于1996年、2002年、2006年发布了三份关于宽恕制度的适用公告,且其近二十年来公告的适用形成了许多经典的案例,随着时间的不断发展,欧盟委员会不断对宽恕制度进行完善,通过从历史沿革的角度和案例分析的方法,总结出其发展趋势,比如申请主体的条件逐渐放宽、对于申请者所提供的证据要求标准逐渐清晰、申请减少罚款的主体义务逐渐增多等趋势。从而使我国宽恕制度及其相关制度趋向精细化和科学化,提高我国宽大制度适用指南的实践性,更好打击实践中存在的卡特尔。 As the most serious harm to the free market competition, the cartel will not only lead to the damage to the interests of consumers, but also destroy the freedom of market economy and the market environment of fair competition. Compared with the United States, the European Union and other countries, the legisla-tion of cartel forgiveness system was started late in China, and the regulations are not perfect, and rich practical experience has not yet been formed. The European commission has in 1996, 2002, 2006 issued three notices about the forgiveness system, and its nearly twenty years announcement applicable formed many classic cases. With the continuous development of time, the European commission to improve forgiveness system, from the perspective of history and case analysis method, summarizes its development trend, such as the application subject conditions gradually relaxed, for the applicant evidence standard gradually clear, applying to reduce the fine subject ob-ligation gradually increased, etc. Thus, China’s forgiveness system and its related systems tend to be refined and scientific, improve the practicality of China’s lenient system application guide, and bet-ter combat the cartel existing in practice.
作者 蒋欣
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《争议解决》 2023年第2期341-351,共11页 Dispute Settlement
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献88

共引文献120

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部