期刊文献+

DEPA数据跨境治理规则研究与我国的制度衔接

Research on DEPA Data Cross-Border Governance Rules and China’s Institutional Convergence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在数字经济时代,数据的战略地位越发凸显,世界各国和各区域贸易协定纷纷规定了符合自身利益的数据跨境治理规则,以规范和有序促进数字经济贸易的发展。随着RCEP、CPTPP和DEPA等的签署推进,我国也正积极推进加入DEPA。然而我国国内数据治理规则与DEPA相关的数据跨境治理规则有着一定出入,若要更顺畅地推进我国的加入签署进程,则我国需要明晰国家安全概念的内涵外延和规范表达,进一步构建系统性的数据管理制度和统一的中央数据监管机构,同时鼓励我国企业加入数据保护可信任标志体系并促进监管互认;如此将利于完善数字治理框架体系和关键性规则安排,建立健全数据要素市场规则、进一步打通数据资源要素的自由流动,更好促进我国数字经济贸易的高质量发展。 In the era of digital economy, the strategic position of data has become more and more prominent, and countries around the world and regional trade agreements have stipulated data cross-border governance rules in their own interests to regulate and orderly promote the development of digital economy and trade. With the signing of RCEP, CPTPP, DEPA, etc., China is also actively promoting its accession to DEPA. However, there is a certain discrepancy between China’s domestic data governance rules and data cross-border governance rules of DEPA. If we want to promote our accession and signing process more smoothly, we need to clarify the connotation and standardized expression of the concept of national security, and further build up a systematic data management system and a unified central data regulatory body. At the same time, China may encourage Chinese enterprises to join the data protection and trust mark system to promote mutual recognition of regulation. This will be conducive to the improvement of the framework system of digital governance and the key rules and regulations, and to the establishment of sound market rules for the elements of data, further opening up the free flow of data resources and elements, so as to better facilitate the high-quality development of China’s digital economy and trade.
出处 《争议解决》 2023年第5期2364-2373,共10页 Dispute Settlement
  • 相关文献

共引文献405

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部