著作专有权利冲突的困惑及思考

Confusion and Thoughts on Conflicts of Exclusive Rights in Works

著作人格权制度围绕着著作品与作者人格之间的关系逻辑构建,存在着包涵范围小、无法涵盖各类作品类型的非财产权利缘由的理论缺陷。著作人格权理论尚不足以涵盖辅助著作财产权行使的精神权能范围,也不利于解决著作人身权性质层面的逻辑冲突。本文主要对于著作人身权的性质、著作财产权与人身权于“权利行使”的冲突、财产权与人身权的边界关系等问题进行研究,同时探讨了特殊作品类型的利益冲突,在此基础上,提出了著作人身权利的“辅助权能”属性。“著作权二元制”仅在维护自然人作者专有权利方面是有正面意义,因此,将署名权、发表权、保护作品完整权等权利从“著作权二元制”的框架冲突中解放出来,从实例出发,通过厘清各类侵权行为的受害权利源头,承认著作人身权的辅助权能是解决专有权利行使冲突、边界冲突以及特殊作品类型冲突所面临困境的理性出路。

The system of moral rights revolves around the logical construction of the relationship between the author and the personality of the author, and there are theoretical shortcomings in the theory that the scope is small and cannot cover the reasons for nonproperty rights of various types of works. The theory of moral rights is not enough to cover the scope of moral power that assists the exercise of property rights in copyrights, nor is it conducive to resolving the logical conflict between the nature of moral rights. This paper mainly studies the nature of moral rights, the conflict between copyright property rights and personal rights in the “exercise of rights”, the boundary relationship between property rights and personal rights, and discusses the conflict of interest of special works types. Therefore, the rights of authorship, publication, and protection of the integrity of works are liberated from the framework conflict of the “dual copyright system”, starting from examples, by clarifying the source of the victimized rights of various infringements, recognizing the auxiliary rights of moral rights is a rational way out to solve the dilemma faced by conflicts in the exercise of exclusive rights, boundary conflicts and conflicts over special types of works.