“毛里求斯与马尔代夫海洋划界案”初步反对意见分析

“Mauritius and Maldives Maritime Delimitation Case”: Analysis of Preliminary Opposition

随着全球化进程的加速和国家之间的相互依赖加深,海洋划界问题逐渐成为各国政府和国际法律界的关注焦点。国际海洋法法庭特别分庭针对“毛里求斯与马尔代夫海洋划界案”的判决,不仅涉及到毛里求斯和马尔代夫两国间的直接争端,还可能对国际海洋法的解释和应用产生深远的影响。本文重点分析了该案中三个核心的国际法问题:首先,针对法庭的特别分庭是否具有对案件的管辖权,本文探讨了法庭管辖权的来源和限制;其次,本文分析了毛里求斯和英国关于查戈斯群岛的主权争端,及其在国际法上的定位;最后,本文对《公约》当事国的义务进行了解读,特别关注其在解决国际争端中的应用和意义。此外,本文还探讨了该判决可能给国际社会带来的启示和影响。基于海洋大国的地位,我国也面临着日益复杂的海洋争端,研究国际海洋争端案例是我国以及国际海洋司法实践的必然要求。

As the process of globalization accelerates and the mutual interdependence among nations deepens, maritime delimitation issues are gradually becoming a focal point for governments and the international legal community. The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, in particular, rendered a judgment on the “Mauritius and Maldives Maritime Delimitation Case”, which not only involves a direct dispute between Mauritius and the Maldives but may also have far-reaching implications for the interpretation and application of international maritime law. This paper focuses on the analysis of three core international law issues in this case: first, regarding whether the special chamber of the court has jurisdiction over the case, the paper explores the sources and limitations of the court’s jurisdiction;second, the paper analyzes the sovereignty dispute between Mauritius and the United Kingdom over the Chagos Archipelago and its position in international law;finally, the paper interprets the obligations of the parties under the convention, with particular attention to its application and significance in resolving international disputes. Additionally, the paper discusses the insights and impacts that the judgment may bring to the international community, aiming to provide valuable reference for similar international disputes.