摘要
基层自治组织在我国的行政法中不是法定的行政机关或行政机构,但是基于实际的授权行为或者辅助行政的行为,这一主体又会进行相关的行政,因此,这也涉及到一些行政救济中的诉讼主体的认定问题。由于实际权利的纠纷,基层自治组织的行政地位的认定关乎责任的承担问题,因此值得讨论和深究。关于我国行政主体中的被告,我国有不同的认定意见。涉及基层自治组织的行政地位的论证问题,笔者通过分析行政法的授权和基层组织的授权实施行为的救济问题,以及背后法理的相关理论和实际案例进行分析讨论论证基层自治组织能否成为被告,得出基层自治组织成为被告的合理性和必然性。
Grass-roots autonomous organization is not a legal administrative organization or administrative organ, but based on the actual authorization act or auxiliary administrative behavior, this subject will carry out the relevant administration, therefore, it also involves the identification of some litigation subject in the administrative relief. Due to the dispute of actual rights, the determination of the administrative status of the grass-roots autonomous organizations is related to the bearing of responsibility, so it is worth discussing and investigating deeply. There are different opinions on the defendant in our administrative subject. Involving the administrative status of autonomous organizations, the author through the analysis of administrative law authorization and authorized relief of grassroots organizations, and the legal theory and practice case, analyzes and discusses whether the grass-roots autonomous organizations can become the defendant, and obtains the rationality and inevitability of the grassroots autonomous organizations becoming the defendant.
出处
《争议解决》
2024年第5期308-312,共5页
Dispute Settlement