期刊文献+

国际投资协定中投资者责任强化研究

Study on Strengthening Investor Responsibility in International Investment Agreements
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统和现行的国际投资协定十分强调投资者保护,让东道国单方面承担义务而忽略了投资者对等的责任问题。具体而言,存在投资者滥用权利、东道国追责被动化及企业社会责任条款任意化的问题。在国际投资协定实体规则方面,应进一步加强投资者义务法定化,守好合理承担责任的边界。在投资者–国家间争端解决规则方面,应着重赋予东道国提请仲裁资格、提高投资者启动仲裁门槛及重视理性投资者裁量标准,从而避免投资者和东道国的利益对立化,实现二者之间的责任平衡。Traditional and current international investment agreements place great emphasis on investor protection, placing unilateral obligations on host countries while ignoring the issue of reciprocal investor liability. Specifically, there are problems of abuse of rights by investors, passive accountability of host countries and arbitrary corporate social responsibility clauses. In terms of the substantive rules of international investment agreements, the legalization of investor obligations should be further strengthened, and the boundary of reasonable liability should be maintained. In terms of Investor-State dispute settlement rules, emphasis should be placed on granting the host state the right to submit arbitration, raising the threshold for investors to initiate arbitration and attaching importance to the rational investor discretion standard, so as avoid the antagonism of the interests of investors and the host countries and achieve a balance of responsibilities between the two.
作者 吕欣莹
出处 《争议解决》 2024年第10期1-6,共6页 Dispute Settlement
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献51

  • 1叶金强.信赖合理性之判断:理性人标准的建构与适用[J].法商研究,2005,22(3):96-103. 被引量:35
  • 2余劲松.外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J].法商研究,2005,22(6):41-48. 被引量:39
  • 3LG&E Energy Corp. et al. v The Republic of Argentina. ICSID ease no. ARB/02/1 (2006) ;Continental Casualty Company v The Argentine Republic. ICSID case no. ARB/O3/gA, award of 5 September 2008.
  • 4See Anthea Roberts, Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States, 104 Am. J. Int' l. L. 179 (2010).
  • 5See William W. Burke -White & Andreas yon Stadan, Investment Protection in Extraordinary Time: The Interpretation and Application of Nort - Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties, 48 Va. J. Int' l L. (2008) 307, 376 - 81.
  • 6Id., 320-324,.
  • 7CMS Gas Transmission Company v The Argentine Republic, ICSID case no. ARB/01/08, 12) (annulment proceeding). Decision of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, 25 September 2007, para. 128 - 136.
  • 8Sempra Energy International v The Argentine Republic. ICSID case no. ARB/02/16 ( Annulment Proceeding), Decision on the Argentine Re- public' s Request for Annulment of the Award, 29 June 2010.
  • 9See Anne van Aakenand Jurgen Kurtz, Prudence or Discrimination? Emergency Measures, The Global Financial Crisis and International Economic Law, 12 J. Int' l Econ. L. 859 (2009).
  • 10SGS v. Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction( August 6 2003 ) [ EB/OL]. Para. 166.

共引文献178

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部