期刊文献+

基于溢出指数方法与DCC-GARCH模型的中国碳市场与能源市场间风险溢出效应研究

Research on Risk Spillover Effect between China’s Carbon Market and Energy Market Based on Spillover Index Method and DCC-GARCH Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着全球气候变化问题的加剧,把握碳市场与能源市场之间的风险溢出效应对于实现减排目标和推动经济转型具有重要意义。本文采用溢出指数方法和DCC-GARCH模型对我国2014年7月1日至2024年6月28日碳市场和能源市场间的风险溢出效应进行了深入分析。研究发现,不同市场条件下,碳市场和能源市场间的风险溢出水平存在明显差异,且风险溢出水平呈现非对称性;广东碳市场与风能、太阳能和原油市场间风险关联性较小,湖北碳市场与能源市场间的风险关联性较大。本研究不仅丰富了碳市场风险溢出效应的理论框架,而且为政策制定者提供了防范系统性风险、优化市场监管的实证依据,具有重要的理论和实践意义。As the global climate change intensifies, it is very important to understand the risk spillover effect of carbon market and energy market in order to realize emission reduction targets and promote economic transition. This paper uses the spillover index method and the DCC-GARCH model to conduct an in-depth analysis of the risk spillover effects the carbon market and the energy market in China from July 1, 2014 to June 28, 2024. The results show that under different market conditions, there are obvious differences in the risk spillover levels between carbon market and energy market, and the risk spillover levels are asymmetrical. The risk correlation among Guangdong carbon market and wind energy market, solar energy market and crude oil market is small, and the risk correlation between Hubei carbon market and energy market is large. This study not only enriches the theoretical framework of carbon market risk spillover, but also provides policy makers with an empirical basis for preventing systemic risks and optimizing market supervision, which is of great theoretical and practical significance.
作者 陈亚琼
出处 《电子商务评论》 2024年第4期5562-5574,共13页 E-Commerce Letters
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献83

  • 1王玉,郇志坚.欧盟碳排放权交易市场的价格发现和波动溢出研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(S1):244-249. 被引量:19
  • 2张跃军,范英,魏一鸣.基于GED—GARCH模型的中国原油价格波动特征研究[J].数理统计与管理,2007,26(3):398-406. 被引量:50
  • 3Maria Mansanet-Bataller,Julien Chevallier,Morgan Hervé-Mignucci,Emilie Alberola.EUA and sCER phase II price drivers: Unveiling the reasons for the existence of the EUA–sCER spread[J].Energy Policy.2010(3)
  • 4Yue-Jun Zhang,Yi-Ming Wei.The crude oil market and the gold market: Evidence for cointegration, causality and price discovery[J].Resources Policy.2010(3)
  • 5Bruno Declercq,Erik Delarue,William D’haeseleer.Impact of the economic recession on the European power sector’s CO 2 emissions[J].Energy Policy.2010(3)
  • 6Fezzi, Carlo,Bunn, Derek W.Structural interactions of European carbon trading and energy prices[J].The Journal of Energy Markets.2009(4)
  • 7Beat Hintermann.Allowance price drivers in the first phase of the EU ETS[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.2009(1)
  • 8A. Denny Ellerman,Barbara K. Buchner.Over-Allocation or Abatement? A Preliminary Analysis of the EU ETS Based on the 2005–06 Emissions Data[J].Environmental and Resource Economics.2008(2)
  • 9Emilie Alberola,Julien Chevallier,Beno??t Chèze.Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005–2007[J].Energy Policy.2007(2)
  • 10E. Georgopoulou,Y. Sarafidis,S. Mirasgedis,D.P. Lalas.Next allocation phase of the EU emissions trading scheme: How tough will the future be?[J].Energy Policy.2005(18)

共引文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部