中外修正研究考察与分析

Investigation and Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Studies on “Repair”

“修正”(repair)领域的研究始于美国,随后语言学者从多角度对其进行探究。本文梳理四十多年来中外“修正”领域研究成果,运用文献计量分析法和内容分析法,对比中外“修正”研究趋势及热点,提出国内研究的不足与潜力:1) 存在术语混用现象,缺乏对“修正”术语与“更正”“纠错”的有效梳理;2) 研究方法单一,缺乏定量分析;3) 研究领域发散程度低,尤其缺乏类型学、对比语言学、互动语言学视角研究;4) 研究层次不深入,缺乏对“修正标记”或“修正构式”的深入研究。

Research in the field of “repair” began in the United States, and then linguists explored it from multiple perspectives. This paper sorts out the research achievements in the field of “repair” at home and abroad for more than 40 years, uses bibliometric analysis and content analysis, com-pares the research trends and hotspots of “repair” at home and abroad, and proposes the short-comings and potential of domestic research: 1) there is a phenomenon of mixed use of terms, lack of effective sorting out of “repair” terms, “correction” and “error correction”;2) single research method and lack of quantitative analysis;3) low degree of divergence in the research field, especially lack of typology, contrastive linguistics, and interactive linguistics perspective research;4) the research level is not in-depth, and there is a lack of in-depth research on “repair markers” or “repair constructions”.