期刊文献+

网络道歉语及道歉策略选择研究——基于美团外卖语料分析

Research on Internet Apology and the Selection of Apology Strategies—Based on the Corpus Analysis of Meituan Takeout
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着网络媒体的发展,人们的线上互动和交流日趋频繁。在此背景下,网络道歉语言和道歉策略研究逐渐成为社会语言学的焦点。网络道歉策略与线下有所不同,主要因为网络环境的匿名性和距离感。本文从研究网络道歉语的特点及道歉策略出发,基于300条美团外卖客户的差评、商家回复和用户追评,从搜集到的语料进行归类分析,发现网络道歉语的特点包括:称谓升级,商家拟人化,以及道歉语中感叹号的大量使用。此外,通过数据分析发现,取得较为积极的道歉效果的策略为“程式性道歉表达 + 提供弥补”道歉策略;取得较为消极道歉效果的策略为“程式性道歉表达 + 辩解解释”道歉策略。网络道歉语言与策略作为新兴的研究领域,与传统的道歉策略存在相似性,但也有其独特性。在数字化时代,理解这些差异及其背后的动因对于提高在线互动的质量具有重要意义。 With the development of online media, people’s online interaction and exchanges are becoming more frequent. In this context, the study of online apology and apology strategy has gradually be-come the focus of social linguistics. The internet apology strategy is different from offline, mainly because of the anonymity and distance of the network environment. This article starts from the characteristics of internet apology and apology strategies. Based on collected 300 Meituan takeout customer reviews, merchant replies and user follow-up comments, through corpus analysis, it is found that the internet apology has the following characteristics: upgrading appellations, an-thropo-morphizing merchants, and the extensive use of exclamation marks in apologies. In addition, through data analysis, it is found that the strategy of obtaining a more positive apology effect is the “explicit illocutionary force indicating device + an offer of repair” apology strategy;the strategy that achieves a relatively negative apology effect is the “explicit illocutionary force indicating device + an explanation or account of the cause which brought about the offence” apology strategy. As an emerging field of research, internet apology language and strategy are similar to traditional apology strategies, but they are also unique. In the era of digitalization, understanding these differences and the cause behind them are of great significance to improving the quality of internet interaction.
作者 辛欣
出处 《现代语言学》 2023年第10期4302-4310,共9页 Modern Linguistics
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献55

  • 1宋亦平,王晓艳.服务失误归因对服务补救效果的影响[J].南开管理评论,2005,8(4):12-17. 被引量:72
  • 2金立印.基于关键事件法的服务失败原因及补救战略效果定性分析[J].管理科学,2005,18(4):63-70. 被引量:26
  • 3郭国庆,杨学成.互联网时代的口碑营销及应用策略[J].财贸经济,2006,27(9):56-59. 被引量:82
  • 4Anderson, Eugene W.. Customer Satisfaction and Word of Mouth[J]. Journal of Service Research, 1998,1(1):5-17.
  • 5Bitner, Mary Jo, Bernard H. Booms and Mary Stanfield Tetreault. The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1990,54(1):71-84.
  • 6Blodgett, Jeffrey G. and Donna J. Hill. The Effects of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Postcomplaint Behavior[J]. Journal of Retailing, 1997,73(2):185-210.
  • 7Bohon, Ruth N. and Katherine N. Lemon. A Dynamic Model of Customers' Usage of Services: Usage as an Antecedent and Consequence of Satisfaction[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1999, 36(2):171 - 186.
  • 8Boshoff, Christo and Leong Jason. Empowerment, Attribution and Apologising as Dimensions of Service Recovery[J]. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 1998,9(1):24-47.
  • 9Ennew, Christine T., Ashish K. Banerjee and Derek Li. Managing Word of Mouth Communication: Empirical Evidence from India[J]. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 2000,18(2/3):75-83.
  • 10Goodwin, Cathy and h, an Ross. Consumer Responses to Service Failures: Influence of Procedural and lnteractional Fairness Perceptions[J]. Journal of Business Research, 1992,25(2):149-163.

共引文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部