CNN和《中国日报》新能源新闻报道中介入系统的生态话语分析

An Ecological Discourse Analysis of Engagement System in the News Reports on New Energy in CNN and China Daily

党的十八大以来,“绿水青山就是金山银山”的理念深入人心,“共抓大保护、不搞大开发”成为了共识。新闻语篇作为大众传播的重要载体,能够传递某种态度、意向和情感,进而影响其认知和行为。本研究从生态话语分析范式切入,对中美新能源新闻语篇中的介入资源展开了深入剖析,尝试挖掘并阐发了介入资源的分布情况与折射的生态理念。研究发现:中美都更多地使用了“扩展”资源。并且,中国新能源语篇报道中有益性介入居多,美国新能源新闻语篇中多为破坏性介入。Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the concept of “clear waters and green mountains are as good as mountains of gold and silver” has been deeply popular, and “well-coordinated environmental conservation and avoiding excessive development” has become a consensus. News discourse, as an important carrier of mass communication, can transmit certain attitudes, intentions and emotions, and then affect their cognition and behavior. Starting from the ecological discourse analysis paradigm, this study conducted an in-depth analysis of the engagement system in Chinese and American new energy news discourses, and tried to dig out and explain the distribution of engagement resources and reflected ecological properties. It is found that both China and America use more expansion resources. In addition, most of the Chinese new energy news reports are eco-beneficial engagement, while most of the American new energy news reports are eco-destructive engagement.