期刊文献+

罗伊适应模式在急性心肌梗死支架植入术后患者护理中的应用效果

Effects of Nursing Methods Based on Roy’s Adaption Model on Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Who Received PCI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨罗伊适应模式在急性心肌梗死支架植入术后患者的护理效果,为临床护理提供参考。方法:选取于2011年8月至2013年12月间在西安交通大学第一、二附属医院心内科住院并接受支架植入术治疗的患者96位,随机分为实验组和对照组,对实验组患者采用基于罗伊适应模式的护理,而对照组患者采用传统护理模式的护理,患者出院后6个月后对其进行随访,采用90项症状自评量表(SCL-90量表)、社会功能缺陷筛选量表(SDSS量表以及焦虑自评量表(SAS量表)对两组患者出院后的心理状况、社会功能障碍情况等进行测量并进行统计学分析)。结果:1) 实验组SCL-90, SDSS and SAS的得分均好于对照组,差异有显著性(P 0.05)。结论:罗伊适应模式能够促进急性心肌梗死支架植入手术患者的身心康复,改善患者出院后的生活质量和社会功能,罗伊适应模式可广泛应用在临床护理工作中。 Objective: To evaluate the effects of nursing method based on Roy’s adaption model on patients with acute myocardial infarction who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: 96 patients encharged in our hospital and received PCI from Aug. 2011 to Dec. 2013 were involved in this research. All the 96 patients were divided into two groups randomly. Patients in experimental group were given nursing care based on Roy’s adaption model while others in control group were given traditional nursing care. These patients were revisited by us using SCL-90, SDSS and SAS at sixth month after discharged to compare the effects of the two nursing methods in their mental condition, social function and anxiety level, and compared the result by statistic analysis. Results: 1) The results showed that patients in experimental group performed better in all the three tests including SCL-90, SDSS and SAS than patients in control group (P 0.05). Conclusion: Nursing care based on Roy’s adaption model may be able to improve the psychological states and avoid the negative emotional feelings including depression and anxiety. Roy adaptation model can be widely used in the clinical nursing work.
出处 《护理学》 2015年第3期52-58,共7页 Nursing Science
基金 陕西省自然科学基金资助项目(2015JM8485) 西安交通大学第一附属医院临床研究基金(.XJTU1AHCR2014-039)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1陈晓.急性心肌梗死患者抗焦虑抑郁药物干预治疗临床观察[J].国际医药卫生导报,2005,11(12):23-24. 被引量:4
  • 2金华 关文源 等.中国正常人SCL-90评选结果的初步分析[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,1986,12:260-263.
  • 3姜安丽.护理理论[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:91.
  • 4汪向东 王希林 马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,12:217-217.
  • 5Louvard Y,Lefever T,Allain A,et al.Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach:The CARAFE study[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2001,52(2):181-187.
  • 6Louvard Y,Ludwig J,Lefevre T,et al.Transradial approach for cornary angioplasty in the setting of acute myocardial infarction:a dual center registry[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2002,55(2):206-211.
  • 7Saito S,Tanaka S,Hiroe Y,et al.Comparative study on transradial approach vs.transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation for patient with acute myocardial infarction:result of the test for myocardial infarction by prospective unicenter randomization for access sites (TEMPURA) trial[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2003,59(1):26.
  • 8Gillum RF,Fortmann SP,Prineas RJ,et al.International diagnostic criteria for acute myoacardial infarction and acute stroke[J].Am Heart J,1984,108(7):150-158.
  • 9Kwaci I,Colditz GA,Ascerio A,et al.Prospective Study of phobic axiety and risk of coronary heart disease in men[J].Circulation 1994,89(5):1992-1997.
  • 10Kim CK,Bartholomew BA,Mastin ST.Detection and reproducibility of mental stress-induced myocardial ischemia with Tc-99msestamibi SPECT in normal and coronary artery disease populations[J].J Nucl Cardiol,2003,10(1):56-62.

共引文献489

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部