摘要
目的:探索慢阻肺患者持续质量改进在肺康复护理中的应用效果。方法:本研究将2020年2月~2021年8月我院呼吸内科收治的100例慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者作为研究对象。按照随机数字法分为观察组与对照组,每组各50例。对照组行常规护理,观察组行持续质量改进护理,在干预3个月之后,用呼吸困难问卷(mMRC)对比两组患者的呼吸困难症状;用第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)以及FEV1/FVC等指标对比两组患者肺功能情况,用圣乔治问卷(SGRQ)对比两组患者生活质量。结果:经过持续质量改进护理干预3个月后,两组患者PEF、FEV1、FEVI/FVC等肺功能指标之间的差异具有统计学意义(P 【0.05)。两组患者圣乔治问卷得分差异具有统计学意义(P 【0.05)。结论:在慢阻肺患者肺康复护理中应用持续质量改进护理模式,可改善患者呼吸困难症状,改善患者肺功能,提升患者生活质量。具有较强临床实用价值,可推广使用。
Objective: To explore the applicationeffect of continuous quality improvement in pulmonary rehabilitation nursing ofpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods: A total of 100patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admitted to the departmentof Respiratory Medicine of our hospital from February 2020 to August 2021 wereselected as the study subjects. According to the random number method, theywere divided into observation group and control group, 50 cases in each group.The control group received routine nursing, and the observation group receivedcontinuous quality improvement nursing. After 3 months of intervention, thedyspnea symptoms of the two groups were compared with the dyspnea questionnaire(mMRC). Forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), forced vitalcapacity (FVC) and FEV1/FVC were used to compare the lung function between thetwo groups, and St. George questionnaire (SGRQ) was used to compare the qualityof life between the two groups. Results: After 3 months of continuous qualityimprovement nursing intervention, there were statistically significantdifferences in PEF, FEV1, FEVI/FVC and other lung function indexes between thetwo groups (P
出处
《护理学》
2022年第1期74-78,共5页
Nursing Science
