期刊文献+

整形美容患者术后采用放松式和激励式护理模式的效果观察

Observation on the Effect of Relaxation and Incentive Nursing Mode after Plastic Surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨放松式和激励式护理模式在整形美容患者术后护理的应用效果。方法:选取于2021年6月~2021年12月到我院接受治疗的整形美容术患者90例为研究对象,采用随机数字法分为观察组及对照组各45例,观察组行观察放松式和激励式护理,对照组行常规护理,对比分析两组患者焦虑及抑郁评分、术后满意度、生活质量进行对比分析。结果:干预前,两组患者SAS及SDS评分差异均不具备统计学意义(P 】0.05)。干预后,观察组患者SAS评分为(42.13 ±6.13),对照组为(52.16 ±6.98),差异具备统计学意义(P【0.05)。观察组SDS评分为(44.14 ±4.18),对照组为(52.14 ±4.89),差异显著(P 【0.01)。手术效果满意度及护理满意度之间均存在显著差异(P 【0.01)。两组患者在生理、心理、物质功能、社会关系等层面,观察组和对照组的平均差异均存在统计学意义(P 【0.05)。结论:采用放松式和激励式护理可改善整形美容患者术后焦虑及抑郁情绪,提升患者术后满意度,提高患者生活质量。具有临床推广价值,可推广应用。 Objective: To explore the applicationeffect of relaxation and incentive nursing mode in postoperative nursing ofplastic and cosmetic patients. Methods: 90 patients with plastic surgery whowere treated in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021 were selectedas the research object. They were randomly divided into observation group andcontrol group, with 45 cases in each group. The observation group receivedrelaxation nursing and incentive nursing, and the control group receivedroutine nursing. The anxiety and depression scores, postoperative satisfactionand quality of life of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results: Beforeintervention, there was no significant difference in SAS and SDS scores betweenthe two groups (P >0.05). After the intervention, the SAS score of theobservation group was (42.13 ±6.13) and that of the control group was (52.16 ±6.98). The difference was statistically significant (P
作者 李宝兰
出处 《护理学》 2022年第2期264-268,共5页 Nursing Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献38

共引文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部