摘要
《最高人民法院关于审理侵犯专利权纠纷案件应用法律若干问题的解释(二)》(下简称《解释二》)弥补了专利法在实践过程乃至立法中的一些问题,但其第二十一条第一款欠妥,无论是在共同侵权制度下讨论还是借鉴间接侵权制度。笔者结合第二十五条反映的对善意第三人予以保护的原则,对该条款的不妥处给出建议。
The judicial interpretation section II on the Patent Law has made up for some problems in the practice and even in the legislation of the Patent Law, but paragraph 1 of the article 21 is not proper, whether from joint infringement perspective or indirect infringement perspective. Article 25 reflects that the judicial interpretation section II protects bonafides third party, so that I would use it for reference and give suggestions on the article 21.
作者
徐宏鸣
Hongming Xu(Department of Intellectual Property, Law School, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Guangdong)
出处
《法学(汉斯)》
2018年第1期7-12,共6页
Open Journal of Legal Science
关键词
共同侵权
间接侵权
善意第三人
Joint Infringement
Indirect Infringement
Bonafides Third Party