期刊文献+

行政复核与行政复议衔接机制探讨

Discussion on the Connection Mechanism between Administrative Review and Administrative Reconsideration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《中华人民共和国行政复议法(修订草案)》第1条明确规定行政复议发挥化解行政争议的主渠道作用。在重构行政复议制度的同时,不可忽视行政复议与其他行政争议救济途径的协调。行政复核主要集中于信访事项、公务员的人事争议和事故认定等领域,是一种行政内部解决行政争议的救济途径。行政复核与行政复议联系紧密又相互区别,应明确行政复核和行政复议在行政纠纷解决机制中的功能定位。构建行政复核与行政复议衔接机制,以期发挥行政复核在行政争议的“前线”和行政复议公正的制度优势。 Article 1 of the Administrative Review Law of the People’s Republic of China (Revised draft) clearly stipulates that administrative review plays the role of the main channel for resolving administrative disputes. While reconstructing the administrative reconsideration system, the coordination between administrative reconsideration and other remedies of administrative disputes cannot be ignored. Administrative review mainly focuses on the matters of complaint reporting, civil servants’ personnel disputes and accident identification and other fields, which is a remedy way to solve administrative disputes within the administration. Administrative review and administrative review are closely related and different from each other. It is necessary to clarify the functional positioning of administrative review and administrative review in the administrative dispute settlement mechanism. Build the mechanism of administrative review and administrative review, in order to give play to the administrative review in the “front line” of administrative disputes and administrative review of justice system advantages.
作者 林森杰
机构地区 暨南大学
出处 《法学(汉斯)》 2023年第1期263-269,共7页 Open Journal of Legal Science
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献113

共引文献186

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部