我国反垄断民事后继诉讼的现实障碍分析

Analysis of the Realistic Obstacles of Antitrust Civil Subsequent Litigation in China

相对于反垄断民事独立诉讼,反垄断民事后继诉讼具有证明违法相对容易,举证责任较轻等相对优势,能够强化反垄断威慑。在司法实践中,由于公共执行决定效力不明确、原告难以获得公共执行资料以及高证明标准,极大地抑制了诉讼积极性,我国反垄断后继诉讼呈现出数量极少、胜诉率极低、损害赔偿象征性等特点,使得其诉讼效益完全无法达成,制度的内生价值证成无法实现。

In comparison with independent civil antitrust litigation, subsequent litigation of antitrust civil has relative advantages such as relatively easy to prove illegal and lighter burden of proof, which can strengthen antitrust deterrence. However, in judicial practice, the litigation is faced with the obstacles of unclear validity of public enforcement decisions, the difficulty for the plaintiff to obtain public enforcement information, and high standard of proof, which significantly inhibit the plaintiff’s enthusiasm for litigation and make China’s antitrust subsequent litigation present a minimal number, shallow success rate and symbolic damages so that the litigation benefits are completely unachievable and the endogenous value of the law system cannot be realized.