摘要
《民法典》第552条首次明文规定了债务加入制度,然仅规定了成立方式及法律后果,未明确如债务加入人的主体资格是否有限制等诸多问题。立法的模糊必然需要明晰的解释,债务加入之目的与保证之功能类似,皆是为保证债务的履行,同时《民法典》第467条明确授权了法律无明文规定时可参照适用类似的规范,故债务加入可参照适用保证合同的某些实证法规范,以提高债务加入制度适用中的确定性。
Article 552 of the Civil Code explicitly stipulates the system of debt accession for the first time, but only specifies the method of establishment and legal consequences, without clarifying many issues such as whether the subject qualification of the debtor is limited. The ambiguity of legislation inevitably requires clear explanations. The purpose of debt accession is similar to the function of guarantee, both of which are to ensure the performance of debt. At the same time, Article 467 of the Civil Code clearly authorizes the application of similar norms when there are no explicit provisions in the law. Therefore, debt addition can refer to certain empirical legal norms applicable to guarantee contracts to improve the certainty of the application of the debt addition system.
出处
《法学（汉斯）》
2023年第3期1713-1717,共5页
Open Journal of Legal Science
