摘要
《刑法修正案(十一)》适应国家发展战略实现了侵犯商业秘密罪从结果犯向情节犯的过渡,其立法上的变化需要对该罪名的规范构造进行重新考察,由于司法解释没有及时跟进,司法实践中不可避免地出现了与刑事立法理念的冲突。作为本罪的入罪标准,对“情节严重”的解释应当坚持体系化的方式,并结合立法理念和刑事政策加以限缩,具体认定时应当打破唯数额论的阐释方式,根据实际情况展开多元化的探讨。并且,侵犯商业秘密罪行为方式多样化,不可对所有行为类型一概而论,应当进行类型化研究对该罪形成体系化保护。
The Amendment (XI) to the Criminal Law, in order to adapt to the national development strategy, has achieved the transition of the offence of infringing on trade secrets from a crime of result to a crime of circumstance. Its legislative changes require a re-examination of the normative structure of the crime, because the judicial interpretation did not follow up in a timely manner, and judicial practice inevitably appeared in conflict with the concept of criminal legislation. As the criminal standard of this crime, the interpretation of the “seriousness of the circumstances” should adhere to the systematic way, and combined with the legislative concept and criminal policy to limit, specific identification should break the amount of the interpretation of the theory, according to the actual situation to carry out diversified discussion. In addition, the crime of infringement of trade secrets is diverse, not all types of behavior can be generalized, and we should carry out a typology of research to form a systematic protection of the crime.
出处
《法学(汉斯)》
2023年第4期3101-3107,共7页
Open Journal of Legal Science