论异步审理模式与直接言词原则的冲突与衔接

Conflict and Compliance between Asynchronous Trial Pattern and Direct Speech Principle

信息技术的高速发展促使科技与司法相互渗透。异步审理模式出现并发展于司法实践,打破时间与空间的束缚,通过“非面对面”和“非同步”的方式进行纠纷解决。该模式兼备开庭审理与书面审理的属性,但其实质依旧是以文字为载体的言词互动,归为开庭审理更为合理。异步审理作为司法实践中的革新,以传统诉讼视角评判难以合乎要求。从异步审理模式的本质出发,该模式因诉讼各方之间能够充分交换信息与及时提问,并不违背直接言词原则。

The rapid development of information technology and judicial technology promotes mutual penetration. The asynchronous trial pattern appears and develops the judicial practice, breaks through the time and the space fetter, through “non-face-to-face” and “non-synchronous” carries on the dispute settlement. This mode has the attribute of both hearing and written hearing, but its essence is still the verbal interaction with words as the carrier, so it is more reasonable to classify it as hearing. As an innovation in judicial practice, asynchronous trial is difficult to be judged from the perspective of traditional litigation. Proceeding from the essence of asynchronous trial mode, this mode does not violate the principle of direct verbalization because it can exchange information and ask questions in time.