期刊文献+

法哲学视阈下的生态正义

Ecological Justice from the Perspective of Legal Philosophy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 法哲学是研究法律的本质、价值和理论基础的学科领域,而生态正义则是关注环境、生态系统和可持续发展的正义原则。在法哲学视阈下,生态正义可以被理解为在法律和道德原则中考虑到环境和生态系统的需求,以保护自然环境、促进可持续发展以及确保人与环境之间的公正关系。本文旨在探讨法哲学视阈下的生态正义,通过对生态正义的概念、理论基础和法律维度进行探讨,可以更好地理解生态正义的内涵和发展历程。同时,将伦理维度纳入讨论,探究生态道德和伦理观念在实现生态正义中的作用。通过对法哲学视阈下的实践路径探讨,可以为推动环境法律的建设与完善、促进生态道德观念的塑造以及加强公众参与和社会治理提供相关策略和方法。通过研究法哲学视阈下的生态正义,有助于理解生态正义在法律哲学领域的重要性,并为推动中国现代化生态建设和全球生态治理提供理论和实践支持。 Legal philosophy is a discipline that explores the nature, values, and theoretical foundations of law, while ecological justice focuses on principles of justice concerning the environment, ecosystems, and sustainable development. From the viewpoint of legal philosophy, ecological justice can be understood as considering the needs of the environment and ecosystems within legal and moral principles, aiming to protect the natural environment, promote sustainable development, and ensure a just relationship between humans and the environment. This article aims to explore ecological justice from the perspective of legal philosophy by examining the concept, theoretical foundations, and legal dimensions of ecological justice. By also incorporating ethical dimensions into the discussion, it investigates the role of ecological ethics and ethical concepts in achieving ecological justice. Through exploring the practical pathways from the perspective of legal philosophy, this research provides relevant strategies and methods for advancing environmental law construction and improvement, promoting the shaping of ecological ethical concepts, and enhancing public participation and social governance. The study of ecological justice from the perspective of legal philosophy helps to understand its importance in the field of legal philosophy, and provides theoretical and practical support for promoting China’s modern ecological construction and global ecological gov-ernance.
作者 何小婵
出处 《法学(汉斯)》 2023年第5期4444-4452,共9页 Open Journal of Legal Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

  • 1李建华,肖毅.自然权利存在何以可能[J].科学技术与辩证法,2005,22(1):1-5. 被引量:14
  • 2竺效.反思松花江水污染事故行政罚款的法律尴尬——以生态损害填补责任制为视角[J].法学,2007(3):6-15. 被引量:54
  • 3戴维·佩珀,刘颖译..生态社会主义:从深生态学到社会正义[M]..济南:山东大学出版社,,2005..72-73,4..
  • 4E.博登海默.法理学-法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004:115-116.
  • 5坎宁安.美国环境百科全书[M].长沙:湖南科学出版社,2003.
  • 6岩佐茂.环境的思想--环境保护与马克思主义的结合处[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2006.
  • 7[古罗马]西塞罗 王焕生.论共和国论法律[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997..
  • 8.马克思恩格斯全集第42卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1979年.129页.
  • 9纳什.大自然的权利:环境伦理学史[M].扬通进译.青岛:青岛出版社,1999.77,67,67-70.
  • 10马克思恩格斯选集第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1972:517.

共引文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部