期刊文献+

论刑法范畴中的自救行为

On Self-Help Behavior in the Scope of Criminal Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着社会的进一步发展,犯罪行为呈现为多种方式的增加,某些情况下无法及时寻求公力救济或者此种情况下寻求公力救济已经对于受损权利无法挽救。因此一些时候,受侵害人会采取自救的方式维护自身的权益。但目前我国尚没有将“自救行为”同正当防卫、紧急避险作为正当化事由规定在刑法理论中,因为在实施中容易造成新的损害,必须加以特别的限制。同时,实践中频繁出现关于自救行为的案例引发了新一轮关于自救行为是否应当立法化的探讨。因此本文立足于对自救行为细致化的梳理,从而为自救行为是否能够立法化做进一步论证,以期能对自救行为有一个全方位的把握。 With the further development of society, criminal behavior presents a variety of ways to increase gradually into a trend of expanding the circle, some cases cannot seek public relief in a timely manner or such cases to seek public relief has been for the salvation of damaged rights has reached impossible. Therefore, sometimes, the aggrieved person will often take the way of self-help to protect their rights and interests. But in China’s current criminal law system, there is no “self-rescue” with self-defense, emergency hedge as a justification in the criminal law theory, because self-rescue in the implementation of the act is more likely to cause new damage, it must be required to impose special restrictions. However, at the same time, the frequent cases of self-help in practice have triggered a new round of discussion in the theoretical community on whether self-help should be legislated. Therefore, this paper is based on a detailed sorting of the act of self-help itself, so as to make further arguments for whether the act of self-help can be legislated, in order to have a comprehensive grasp of the act of self-help.
作者 戴昕
机构地区 扬州大学法学院
出处 《法学(汉斯)》 2023年第5期4600-4610,共11页 Open Journal of Legal Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献45

  • 1翁晓斌.论民事审判的正当性[J].现代法学,1999,21(2):70-74. 被引量:4
  • 2赵承寿.论司法裁判的合法性[J].法律科学,2002,20(3):15-22. 被引量:6
  • 3大冢仁 冯军译.犯罪论的基本问题[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1993.286.
  • 4[日]棚濑孝雄 王亚新译.《纠纷的解决与审判制度》[M].中国政法大学出版社,1994年版.译序第2页.第124页.第256页.
  • 5[意]贝卡利亚.《论犯罪与刑罚》[M].中国大百科全书出版社,1993年版.第59页.
  • 6[美]弗里德曼 周叶谦译.《法律制度》[M].中国政法大学出版社,1994年版.第21页.
  • 7Douglas Ivor Brandon et al., "Self- Help: Extrajudicial Rights, Privileges and Remedies in Contemlaorarv American Society," Vand. L Rev., vol.37 (1984), pp. 845, 850, 882.
  • 8Neil Vidmar, "Retribution and Revenge," in Joseph Sanders & V Lee Hamilton, eds, Handbook of Justice Research in Law,( Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2001), pp. 31-63.
  • 9[美]德沃金.《法律帝国》[M].中国大百科出版社,1996年版.第361页.
  • 10[英]阿蒂亚 范悦.《法律与现代社会》[M].辽宁教育出版社·牛津大学出版社,1998年版.第8页.

共引文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部