论认罪认罚案件中被告人的上诉权

On the Defendant’s Right of Appeal in the Case of Pleading Guilty and Admitting Punishment

认罪认罚从宽制度作为我国《刑事诉讼法》在2018年修改后的新制度,其适用目的在于有效提高司法诉讼效率、加强人权保障、优化司法资源配置。但在认罪认罚案件中,仍有部分被告人在一审判决后选择提起上诉,其上诉原因具有多样性,其中不乏法院判决结果与检察院提出的定罪量刑建议不一致、被告人希望通过上诉获得再次从宽处理的情况。上诉权是法律赋予被告人的一项基本权利,不能强制剥夺,但上诉权的滥用不可避免,也应在一定程度上对上诉权进行限制。本文将通过阐释认罪认罚案件中被告人上诉权的现有理论学说,列举国外上诉相关制度的适用情况并探讨这些制度对我国的借鉴意义,分析上诉权的限定模式,进而提出减少司法实践中被告人上诉几率的解决路径。

As a new system after the revision of China’s Criminal Procedure Law in 2018, the lenient system of pleading guilty and admitting punishment aims at effectively improving the efficiency of judicial proceedings, strengthening the protection of human rights and optimizing the allocation of judicial resources. However, in the case of pleading guilty and admitting punishment, some defendants still choose to appeal after the judgment of the first instance. There are many reasons for their appeal, including that the judgment result of the court is inconsistent with the conviction and sentencing proposal put forward by the procuratorate, and the defendant hopes to get lenient treatment again through appeal. The right of appeal is a basic right given to the defendant by law, which cannot be forcibly deprived, but the abuse of the right of appeal is inevitable, and the right of appeal should be restricted to some extent. This paper will explain the existing theoretical theory of the defendant’s right of appeal in the case of pleading guilty and admitting punishment, compare the application of foreign appeal related systems and explore the reference significance for China, analyze the limited mode of the right of appeal, and then put forward the solution to reduce the defendant’s appeal probability in judicial practice.