摘要
个人信息权利作为宪法基本权利意味着其保护逻辑的底层变动。个人信息与个人隐私与个人数据三者既有联系也有区别。个人信息权利作为《宪法》基本权利的赞成者主要考虑“法定人权”带来稳定的,有权威的法律规范的保障;反对者从法律的稳定性出发,考虑可能出现的“有限政府”原则的破坏。个人信息权利作为宪法基本权利的证成,从我国宪法存有未列举的基本权利入手,分析个人信息权利属于我国公民最基本的社会权;符合宪法核心秩序“人的尊严”的一般要求;并且可以从《宪法》第33条第3款规定的“人权条款”以及第38条规定的“人格尊严条款”中加以推导。
The right to personal information, as a fundamental constitutional right, implies a fundamental change in its protection logic. There are both connections and differences between personal information, personal privacy, and personal data. The proponents of the right to personal information, as a fundamental right of the Constitution, mainly consider the protection of stable and authoritative legal norms brought by “statutory human rights”;Opponents consider the potential disruption of the principle of “limited government” from the perspective of legal stability. The right to personal information, as a proof of the fundamental rights of the Constitution, starts from the basic rights that are not listed in the Constitution of China, and analyzes that the right to personal information belongs to the most basic social rights of Chinese citizens;Comply with the general requirements of the constitutional core order of “human dignity”;And it can be derived from the “human rights clause” stipulated in Article 33 (3) of the Constitution and the “personal dignity clause” stipulated in Article 38.
出处
《法学(汉斯)》
2023年第6期5465-5470,共6页
Open Journal of Legal Science