期刊文献+

论人工智能创作物的著作权保护

On Copyright Protection of Artificial Intelligence Creations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近几年来人工智能科学技术逐渐进入大众视野,随之而来的是人们的生活理念和法律需求也日渐改变。大数据的时代洪流下人工智能时代的到来是其中一股不可逆的时代潮流。科技是把双刃剑,人工智能科技的出现和发展伴随着各种挑战和怀疑,随着人工智能对话聊天机器人ChatGPT的推出,更是明显突出了人工智能科技相关产物属性认定不明晰的难题。人工智能创作物著作权保护面临着许多的现实困境:第一,人工智能创作物的界限不明;第二,人工智能创作物的权属配置不明;第三,人工智能创作物的保护模式不明。本文结合我国《著作权法》的相关规定,基于作品“可复制性”、“独创性”、和“智力成果”三个特征,探究积极探索人工智能创作物著作权的归属以及人工智能创作物著作权保护的可行路径,提出了应当将人工智能著作权的所有权归属实际使用者和所有者。并且针对面临的现实困境提出了以下保护路径:首先要明确人工智能创作物具有著作权客体属性;其次明晰人工智能创作物的权利归属;最后对人工智能创作物著作权采取邻接权保护模式进行保护。 In recent years, artificial intelligence science and technology have gradually entered the public’s vision, followed by people’s life concepts and legal needs are also changing. The advent of the era of artificial intelligence under the era of big data is one of the irreversible trends of The Times. Science and technology is a double-edged sword. The emergence and development of artificial intelligence technology is accompanied by various challenges and doubts. With the launch of the artificial intelligence dialogue ChatGPT, the problem of unclear identification of the attributes of products related to artificial intelligence technology has been significantly highlighted. The copyright protection of artificial intelligence creations is faced with many practical dilemmas: first, the boundary of artificial intelligence creations is unclear;Second, the ownership of artificial intelligence creations is unclear;Third, the protection mode of artificial intelligence creations is unclear. Based on the relevant provisions of China’s Copyright Law and the three characteristics of “replicability”, “originality” and “intellectual achievement” of works, this paper explores the ownership of the copyright of artificial intelligence creations and the feasible path of copyright protection of artificial intelligence creations, and puts forward that the ownership of artificial intelligence Copyrights should be attributed to the actual users and owners. In view of the realistic dilemma, the following protection paths are proposed: Firstly, we should make clear that artificial intelligence creation has the property of copyright object;Secondly, clarify the ownership of rights of artificial intelligence creations;Finally, we adopt the mode of adjacent right protection to protect the copyright of artificial intelligence creation.
作者 万菊
机构地区 贵州大学法学院
出处 《法学(汉斯)》 2023年第6期5722-5728,共7页 Open Journal of Legal Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献60

  • 1陈锦川.确定“独创性”标准不能忽视的两个因素[J].中国版权,2018,0(6):26-28. 被引量:6
  • 2姚卫群.佛教的伦理思想与现代社会[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1999,36(3):84-91. 被引量:14
  • 3徐祖林.财产及财产权的概念与分类[J].经济与社会发展,2005,3(4):90-94. 被引量:7
  • 4www.ncac.gov.cn,2005年6月13日.
  • 5《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》第1条至第40条.
  • 6Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co. , Inc. , 499 U.S. 340, 18 USPQ 2d 1275 (1991).
  • 7[美]理查德·波斯纳.《论剽窃》,沈明译,北京:北京大学出版社2010年1月第1版,页37,38,125.
  • 8See Andrew J. Wu, From Video Games to Artificial Intelligence Assigning Copyright Ownership toWorks Generated by Increasingly Sophisticated Computer Program, 25 AIPLA Q.J. 131, 154(1997).
  • 9http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/titeki2/150414/gijiroku.html.
  • 10http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/titeki2/kettei/chizaikeikaku20160509.pdf.

共引文献553

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部