认罪认罚案件证据开示之本土化路径探究

Study on the Localization Path of Evidence Discovery in Guilty Plea Cases

在我国现有控辩双方审前信息交换机制下,认罪认罚案件中被追诉人的证据知悉权保障不足,进而影响认罪认罚的自愿性和真实性。认罪认罚案件设立证据开示的正当性在于有利于保障被追诉人的证据知悉权,促进控辩双方实质协商,形成精准的量刑建议;设立证据开示的必要性在于阅卷制度和庭前会议无法确保控辩双方对于证据的全面沟通。在此背景下,应当积极探索认罪认罚案件中证据开示的本土化路径探究,实现检察机关的程序主导,确保被追诉人自愿、真实认罪认罚。

Under the existing pretrial information exchange mechanism of both prosecution and defense in our country, the right to know all the evidence of the accused in the case of guilty plea is insufficient, which affects the voluntary and authenticity of guilty plea. The legitimacy of establishing evidence disclosure in guilty plea cases is that it is conducive to protecting the defendant’s right to know all the evidence, promoting the substantive negotiation between the prosecution and the defense, and forming accurate sentencing suggestions. The necessity of establishing evidence discovery lies in the fact that the examination paper system and the pre-trial conference cannot ensure the full communication of the evidence between the prosecution and the defense. In this context, we should actively explore the localization path of evidence discovery in guilty plea cases, realize the procedural leadership of procuratorial organs, and ensure the voluntary and true guilty plea of the accused.