期刊文献+

论未成年人网络直播打赏行为的法律规制研究

On the Study of Legal Regulation of Minors’ Webcast Reward Behavior
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,随着互联网技术和电子支付方式的高速发展,网络直播中未成年人打赏主播的行为屡见不鲜。未成年人由于其认知能力尚不够成熟,在网络直播的诱惑下极易沉迷其中,并做出打赏行为,引发了众多法律问题。打赏行为效力认定障碍、责任承担主体认定困难、有效监管体制缺位等问题亟待解决。首先,对未成年人网络直播打赏行为法律性质的认定进行分析,认为网络打赏行为应认定为混合合同;其次,我国未成年人网络直播打赏法律规制存在一些问题,我国打赏行为效力的认定和责任承担主体的认定方面存在障碍、监管主体、治理手段和合作机制等方面存在漏洞;最后,通过综合认定打赏行为的效力、构建责任主体多元化的承担机制、构建有效的监管机制,完善我国未成年人网络直播打赏法律规制。 In recent years, with the rapid development of Internet technology and electronic payment methods, the behavior of minors rewarding anchors in webcasting is common. Minors because of their cognitive ability is not mature enough, in the network live under the temptation is very easy to be addicted to it, and make reward behavior, triggering a lot of legal problems. Reward behavior effectiveness determination obstacles, the responsibility of the main body to determine the difficulty, the lack of effective supervision system and other problems need to be solved. First of all, the determination of the legal nature of the minors’ network live reward behavior is analyzed, and it is believed that the network reward behavior should be recognized as a mixed contract;secondly, there are some problems in China’s minors’ network live reward legal regulation, China’s relevant legislative system is not sound, there are obstacles in the determination of the effectiveness of the reward behavior and the determination of the main body of the responsibility, and there are loopholes in the supervisory main body, the means of governance, and the mechanism of cooperation. Finally, through improving the relevant legislative system, comprehensively determining the effectiveness of rewarding behavior, constructing a diversified mechanism for assuming the responsibility of the main body, and constructing an effective regulatory mechanism, we will improve the legal regulation of minors’ live streaming rewarding on the Internet in China.
机构地区 湖北大学法学院
出处 《法学(汉斯)》 2024年第2期705-711,共7页 Open Journal of Legal Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献25

  • 1曹林.网络立法,以“法制”替代“管制”[J].时代人物,2013,0(1):25-25. 被引量:1
  • 2全国人大常委会法制工作委员会民法室.《中华人民共和国合同法及其重要草稿介绍》[M].法律出版社,2000年版.第23页,第116页,第177页.
  • 3[日]河上正二.《商品的服务化与服务的缺陷、瑕疵(上)》[J].NBL,1996,:7-7.
  • 4[日]北村一郎编.《法国民法典的200年》,有斐阁,2006年版,第317页以下.
  • 5[日]后藤卷则.《消费合同法的法理论》,弘文堂,2002年版,第300页以下
  • 6[日]浦川道太郎.《服务合同中的消费者被害救济-不完全的服务提供与服务提供人的责任》,载《现代法(13)消费生活与法》,岩波书店,1997年版,第220页以下
  • 7[日]川端敏男.《服务合同的多样化与消费者保护》[J].早稻田法学,1999,:261-261.
  • 8[日]中田裕康.《现代服务提供合同的特征(中)》[J].NBL,1995,:34-34.
  • 9[日]长坂纯.《服务提供者责任的基本构造》[J].法律论丛(明治大学法律研究所),2005,:39-39.
  • 10[日]松本恒雄.《服务合同》,载《债权法改正的课题与方向》(NBL地特刊),社团法人商事法务研究会,1998年版,第202页以下

共引文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部