期刊文献+

基于POWAD算子的犹豫模糊语言多属性决策方法

Method for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Multi-Attribute Decision Making Based on POWAD Operator
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了综合考虑决策问题的概率信息和决策专家的犹豫不决和态度特征,将概率有序加权平均距离(POWAD)算子推广到犹豫模糊语言环境,介绍了犹豫模糊语言概率有序加权平均距离(HFLPOWAD)算子。基于TOPSIS方法,根据决策方案与理想方案的综合贴近度,提出了一种犹豫模糊语言多属性群决策方法。最后,通过一个投资项目的选择案例阐明了该方法的有效性。 In order to comprehensively consider the probability information of decision making problems and the attitude characteristics of decision experts, the hesitant fuzzy linguistic probabilistic ordered weighted averaging distance (HFLPOWAD) operator is introduced by extending the probabilistic ordered weighted averaging distance (POWAD) operator to hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment. Based on TOPSIS method, the approach for hesitant fuzzy linguistic multi-attribute group decision making is proposed according to the comprehensive closeness coefficient of the decision alternatives relative to the ideal alternative solution. Finally, an investment selection problem is employed to illustrate the effectiveness of the approach.
出处 《运筹与模糊学》 2021年第2期238-246,共9页 Operations Research and Fuzziology
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1冯向前,魏翠萍,李宗植,胡钢.区间数互补判断矩阵一致性及其权重算法研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2007,37(19):87-93. 被引量:6
  • 2Rodr′iguez Rosa M, Mart′inez Luis, Herrera Francisco, et al. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making[J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems, 2012, 20(1): 109-119.
  • 3Rodr′iguez Rosa M, Mart′inez Luis, Herrera Francisco, et al. A group decision making model dealing with comparative expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets[J]. Information Sciences, 2013, 241(8): 28-42.
  • 4Wang Jianqiang, Wang Jing, Chen Qinghui, et al. An outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 280(10): 338-351.
  • 5Liu Hongbin, Rodr′iguez Rosa M. A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multi-criteria decision making[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 258(2): 220-238.
  • 6Zhu Bin, Xu Zeshui. Consistency measures of hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations[J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 22(1): 34-35.
  • 7Liu Hongbin, Cai Jianfeng, Jiang Le. On improving the additive consistency of the fuzzy preference relation based on comparative Linguistic expressions[J]. Int J of Intelligent Systems, 2014, 29(6): 544-559.
  • 8Beg Ismat, Tabasam Rashid. TOPSIS for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets[J]. Int J of Intelligent Systems, 2013, 28(12): 1162-1171.
  • 9Liao Huchang, Xu Zeshui, Zeng Xiaojun. Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 271(7): 125-142.
  • 10Lee Liwei, Chen Shyiming. Fuzzy decision making based on likelihood-based comparison relations of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and hesitant fuzzy linguistic operators[J]. Information Sciences, 2015, 294(2): 513-529.

共引文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部