基于CiteSpace的中韩托育服务研究比较分析

A Comparative Analysis of Childcare Services in China and South Korea Based on CiteSpace

本文利用CiteSpace软件,以CNKI期刊论文和KCI期刊论文中2000~2022年的托育服务相关文献为研究对象,运用词频分析、聚类分析、突现分析等科学计量方法,对中韩托育服务研究的发表趋势、研究热点和演进历程作可视化分析。研究发现,韩国关注供给质量、规范标准等应用层面研究,而我国则着重关注概念阐释、政策解读等理论层面研究。韩国虽已构建了高质量普惠托育体系但对提高生育意愿的促进作用有限,打造生育友好型社会托育服务建设只是其中一环,也需各个向度同向持续发力。未来研究应强调多学科视域的探索,加强托育服务的应用性研究,推动托育服务建设向纵深发展提高托育服务质量和规范化程度。

In this paper, CiteSpace software was used to analyze the publication trend, research hotspots and evolution process of childcare service research in China and South Korea by using scien-tometric methods such as word frequency analysis, cluster analysis and emergence analysis by taking the relevant literature of childcare service from 2000 to 2022 in CNKI journal papers and KCI journal papers as the research object. The results show that South Korea focuses on applied research such as supply quality and norms, while China focuses on theoretical research such as concept interpretation and policy interpretation. Although South Korea has built a high-quality inclusive childcare system, it has limited effect on improving fertility intention, and the construction of childbirth-friendly social childcare services is only one of the parts, and it also needs to continue to make efforts in the same direction in all directions. Future research should emphasize the exploration of multidisciplinary perspectives, strengthen the applied research of childcare services, promote the in-depth development of childcare services, and improve the quality and standardization of childcare services.