期刊文献+

Penumbral Dose Characteristics of Physical and Virtual Wedge Profiles

Penumbral Dose Characteristics of Physical and Virtual Wedge Profiles
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Purpose: Both physical and virtual wedges are used in radiotherapy to get uniform and desired dose distribution in clinical setting. All linear accelerators of different venders have computer controlled dynamic wedges called virtual wedge filters. Penumbra is one of the important photon beam characteristics needed to be understood in radiation therapy at the time of commissioning of Treatment Planning system (TPS) as well as applying various treatment planning algorithms in clinical applications. In this study we measured the dose profiles of open field, physical wedges (PW) and virtual wedges (VW) for energies (6 MV & 15 MV), various field sizes (10 × 10, 15 × 15 & 20 × 20 cm2), depths (dmax, 10 cm, 20 cm) and wedge angles (15°, 30°, 45° and 60°). From beam profile we calculated the penumbral width for open and wedged fields. The study was carried out on Siemens ONCOR IMRT Plus linear accelerator. The obtained penumbral width of PW and VW of all wedge angles was subtracted from the penumbral width of open field. The deviations in penumbral width were compared and statistically analyzed as a function of energy, depth, field size and wedge angles. Material and Method: The penumbral width was measured using IBA CC13 ion chamber in IBA Blue phantom (a 3D water phantom). The source to surface distance (SSD) during our study was kept 100cm and measurement was taken for 10 × 10, 15 × 15, 20 × 20 cm2 field sizes and for 15°, 30°, 45°, 60° wedges. These measurements were taken for both 6 MV and 15 MV photon energies. Virtual wedge profiles were acquired using LDA-99 linear detector array (IBA, Germany). The deviations in penumbral width for both PW and VW were calculated by subtracting the penumbral width from open field penumbral width in gun direction (in-plane) and deviation in VW penumbral width, and were obtained by subtracting the open field penumbral width in left-right direction (cross-plane) direction. The measured deviations were plotted for both PW and VW. Statistics on the measured deviations was performed by using SPSS Version 15. Results & Conclusion: The results of one way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) show that the deviations are significant with energy and the deviations are higher in lower energy than higher energy. The deviations increase as depth increases, the deviations are also significant with depth. The deviations increase with field sizes;the deviations as a function of field size are highly significant. The deviations are higher in PW than VW but the deviations with wedge type are in-significant. As wedge angle increases, deviations also increase and the effect of wedge angle is highly significant on deviations. Purpose: Both physical and virtual wedges are used in radiotherapy to get uniform and desired dose distribution in clinical setting. All linear accelerators of different venders have computer controlled dynamic wedges called virtual wedge filters. Penumbra is one of the important photon beam characteristics needed to be understood in radiation therapy at the time of commissioning of Treatment Planning system (TPS) as well as applying various treatment planning algorithms in clinical applications. In this study we measured the dose profiles of open field, physical wedges (PW) and virtual wedges (VW) for energies (6 MV & 15 MV), various field sizes (10 × 10, 15 × 15 & 20 × 20 cm2), depths (dmax, 10 cm, 20 cm) and wedge angles (15°, 30°, 45° and 60°). From beam profile we calculated the penumbral width for open and wedged fields. The study was carried out on Siemens ONCOR IMRT Plus linear accelerator. The obtained penumbral width of PW and VW of all wedge angles was subtracted from the penumbral width of open field. The deviations in penumbral width were compared and statistically analyzed as a function of energy, depth, field size and wedge angles. Material and Method: The penumbral width was measured using IBA CC13 ion chamber in IBA Blue phantom (a 3D water phantom). The source to surface distance (SSD) during our study was kept 100cm and measurement was taken for 10 × 10, 15 × 15, 20 × 20 cm2 field sizes and for 15°, 30°, 45°, 60° wedges. These measurements were taken for both 6 MV and 15 MV photon energies. Virtual wedge profiles were acquired using LDA-99 linear detector array (IBA, Germany). The deviations in penumbral width for both PW and VW were calculated by subtracting the penumbral width from open field penumbral width in gun direction (in-plane) and deviation in VW penumbral width, and were obtained by subtracting the open field penumbral width in left-right direction (cross-plane) direction. The measured deviations were plotted for both PW and VW. Statistics on the measured deviations was performed by using SPSS Version 15. Results & Conclusion: The results of one way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) show that the deviations are significant with energy and the deviations are higher in lower energy than higher energy. The deviations increase as depth increases, the deviations are also significant with depth. The deviations increase with field sizes;the deviations as a function of field size are highly significant. The deviations are higher in PW than VW but the deviations with wedge type are in-significant. As wedge angle increases, deviations also increase and the effect of wedge angle is highly significant on deviations.
出处 《International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology》 2017年第2期216-224,共9页 医学物理学、临床工程、放射肿瘤学(英文)
关键词 PHYSICAL WEDGE VIRTUAL WEDGE PENUMBRA and DEVIATIONS Physical Wedge Virtual Wedge Penumbra and Deviations
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献17

  • 1Arnfield M R,Siebers J V,Kim J O,Wu Q,Keall P J,Mohan R.A method for determining multileaf collimator transmission and scatter for dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy. Medical Physics . 2000
  • 2Klein E E,Low D A.Interleaf leakage for 5 and 10 mm dynamic multileaf collimation systems incorporating patient motion. Medical Physics . 2001
  • 3G. Grigorov,J. C. L. Chow,N. Yazdani.Dosimetry limitations and pre-treatment dose profile correction for sliding window IMRT. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH . 2010
  • 4Adam S Garden,William H Morrison,David I Rosenthal,K.S.Clifford Chao,K.Kian Ang.??Target coverage for head and neck cancers treated with IMRT: review of clinical experiences(J)Seminars in Radiation Oncology . 2004 (2)
  • 5Craig Elith,Shane E. Dempsey,Naomi Findlay,Helen M. Warren-Forward.??An Introduction to the Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Techniques, Tomotherapy, and VMAT(J)Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences . 2011 (1)
  • 6Tony Wang,Nadeem Riaz,Simon Cheng,Jiade Lu,Nancy Lee.??Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a review(J)Journal of Radiation Oncology . 2012 (2)
  • 7C.E. Agnew,D.M. Irvine,A.R. Hounsell,C.K. McGarry.??Improvement in clinical step and shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery accuracy on an integrated linear accelerator control system(J)Practical Radiation Oncology . 2014 (1)
  • 8Grigorov G,Barnett R B,Chow J C L.IMRT step and shoot technique-correction of segment dose delivery due to the overshoot effect. Biomed Techn . 2005
  • 9Marks RJ.Introduction to Shannon Sampling and Interpolation Theory. . 1991
  • 10Grigorov G,Foster K,Chow JCL,Osei E.Prostate IMRT:Twodimensional model of rectal NTCP employing the variability of rectal motion and rectum wall thickness. Int J Rad Res . 2014

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部