期刊文献+

Automated Linac QA Using Scripting and Varian Developer Mode

Automated Linac QA Using Scripting and Varian Developer Mode
下载PDF
导出
摘要 <span><span><b><span style="font-family:"">Purpose:</span></b></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> Linac quality assurance (QA) can be time consuming involving set up, execution, analysis and subject to user variability. The purpose of this study i</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">s to develop qualitative automation tools for mechanical and imaging QA to improve efficiency, consistency, and accuracy. <b>Methods and Materials: </b>Traditionally QA ha</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">s</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> been performed with graph paper, film, and multiple phantoms. Analysis consists of ruler and vendor provided software. We have developed a single four-phantom<b> </b>method for QA procedures including light-radiation coincidence, imaging quality, table motion and Isocentricity an</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">d separately cone beam computed tomography. XML scripts were developed to execute a series of tasks using Varian’s Truebeam Developer Mode. Non-phantom QA procedures have also been developed including field size, dose rate, MLC position, MLC and gantry speed, star shot, Winston-Lutz and Half Beam Block. All analysis is performed using inhouse MATLAB codes. <b>Results: </b>Overall time savings were 2.2 hours per Linac per month. Consistency improvements (standard deviation, STD) were observed for some tests. For example: field size improved from 0.11</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm to 0.04</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm and table motion improved from 0.17</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm to 0.12</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm. CBCT STD improved from 0.99</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm to 0.61</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm for slice thickness. No STD change was observed for Isocentricity test. We noticed an increase in STD from 0.33</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm to 0.41</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm for light-radiation coincidence test. There was a small drop in field size accuracy. Isocentricity showed an increase in measurement accuracy from 0.47</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm to 0.15</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm. Table motion increased in accuracy from 0.20</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm to 0.16</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm. <b>Conclusion: </b>Automation is a viable, accurate and efficient option for monthly and annual QA. <span><span><b><span style="font-family:"">Purpose:</span></b></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> Linac quality assurance (QA) can be time consuming involving set up, execution, analysis and subject to user variability. The purpose of this study i</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">s to develop qualitative automation tools for mechanical and imaging QA to improve efficiency, consistency, and accuracy. <b>Methods and Materials: </b>Traditionally QA ha</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">s</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> been performed with graph paper, film, and multiple phantoms. Analysis consists of ruler and vendor provided software. We have developed a single four-phantom<b> </b>method for QA procedures including light-radiation coincidence, imaging quality, table motion and Isocentricity an</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">d separately cone beam computed tomography. XML scripts were developed to execute a series of tasks using Varian’s Truebeam Developer Mode. Non-phantom QA procedures have also been developed including field size, dose rate, MLC position, MLC and gantry speed, star shot, Winston-Lutz and Half Beam Block. All analysis is performed using inhouse MATLAB codes. <b>Results: </b>Overall time savings were 2.2 hours per Linac per month. Consistency improvements (standard deviation, STD) were observed for some tests. For example: field size improved from 0.11</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm to 0.04</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm and table motion improved from 0.17</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm to 0.12</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm. CBCT STD improved from 0.99</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm to 0.61</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm for slice thickness. No STD change was observed for Isocentricity test. We noticed an increase in STD from 0.33</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm to 0.41</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm for light-radiation coincidence test. There was a small drop in field size accuracy. Isocentricity showed an increase in measurement accuracy from 0.47</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm to 0.15</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm. Table motion increased in accuracy from 0.20</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm to 0.16</span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span></span><span><span><span><span style="font-family:"">mm. <b>Conclusion: </b>Automation is a viable, accurate and efficient option for monthly and annual QA.
作者 Keith Pearman Nicholas Koch David Wiant Han Liu Benjamin Sintay Keith Pearman;Nicholas Koch;David Wiant;Han Liu;Benjamin Sintay(Department of Radiation Oncology, Cone Health Cancer Center, North Carolina, USA)
出处 《International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology》 2021年第4期149-168,共20页 医学物理学、临床工程、放射肿瘤学(英文)
关键词 Varian Developer Mode SCRIPTING Automation Varian Developer Mode Scripting Automation
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部