期刊文献+

Dosimetric Improvements Utilising Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme 被引量:2

Dosimetric Improvements Utilising Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Aims: The EORTC-NCI study investigating the addition of temozolomide trial to standard radiation therapy has demonstrated improved duration of survival in patients with Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). With longer survival duration, there is the potential for latent RT morbidity, not previously seen in historical patients. This study evaluates the potential dosimetric advantages of utilising IMRT over 3D-conformal RT in such patients. Methods: 10 consecutive patients with GBM formally screened for a clinical study over a two-month period were planned and treated with IMRT utilising daily on-board imaging (OBI). The EORTC protocol dosimetric criteria and constraints were used in target delineation and planning. For each patient, a 3DCRT plan was also produced. Endpoints for dosimetric evaluation analysed related to tumour dose: mean PTV60 dose (mPTV60Dose), Conformity Index (CI);and normal tissue dose: mean normal brain dose (mBrainDose) and V40 Brain (Brainv40). IGRT endpoints were the median isocentre shifts required in 3 axes measured in one direction. The variation between the IMRT and 3DCRT dosimetric endpoints was examined using Wilcoxon analysis. Results: The 10 patients had tumours located in temporal (3), parietal (3), occipital (2) and callosal (2) regions. The median PTV and normal brain volumes were 308.1 cm3 and 1077.5 cm3 respectively. The IMRT dosimetry was significantly improved in all endpoints specifically CI (p = 0.002), mPTV60Dose (p = 0.004), mBrainDose (p = 0.002) and Brainv40 (p = 0.019). OBI directed isocentre measurements in the patient group were available for 230 treatments. The median shifts (and 95% C.I.s) were 0.1 cm vertical (0.1 - 0.2), 0.1 cm longitudinal (0.1 - 0.2) and 0.2 cm lateral (0.2 - 0.2). At a minimum follow-up of 2 years’ post diagnosis, the median survival of the group is 18.0 months (95% CI: 13.4 - 22.6 months). Conclusion: IMRT for GBM produces significant dosimetric advantages in relation to planning target volume and normal tissue dose compared with 3D conformal plans. The data also confirm the accuracy of IMRT technique for CNS with IGRT delivery utilising OBI demonstrating minimal deviation from planned to treated isocentre. Aims: The EORTC-NCI study investigating the addition of temozolomide trial to standard radiation therapy has demonstrated improved duration of survival in patients with Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). With longer survival duration, there is the potential for latent RT morbidity, not previously seen in historical patients. This study evaluates the potential dosimetric advantages of utilising IMRT over 3D-conformal RT in such patients. Methods: 10 consecutive patients with GBM formally screened for a clinical study over a two-month period were planned and treated with IMRT utilising daily on-board imaging (OBI). The EORTC protocol dosimetric criteria and constraints were used in target delineation and planning. For each patient, a 3DCRT plan was also produced. Endpoints for dosimetric evaluation analysed related to tumour dose: mean PTV60 dose (mPTV60Dose), Conformity Index (CI);and normal tissue dose: mean normal brain dose (mBrainDose) and V40 Brain (Brainv40). IGRT endpoints were the median isocentre shifts required in 3 axes measured in one direction. The variation between the IMRT and 3DCRT dosimetric endpoints was examined using Wilcoxon analysis. Results: The 10 patients had tumours located in temporal (3), parietal (3), occipital (2) and callosal (2) regions. The median PTV and normal brain volumes were 308.1 cm3 and 1077.5 cm3 respectively. The IMRT dosimetry was significantly improved in all endpoints specifically CI (p = 0.002), mPTV60Dose (p = 0.004), mBrainDose (p = 0.002) and Brainv40 (p = 0.019). OBI directed isocentre measurements in the patient group were available for 230 treatments. The median shifts (and 95% C.I.s) were 0.1 cm vertical (0.1 - 0.2), 0.1 cm longitudinal (0.1 - 0.2) and 0.2 cm lateral (0.2 - 0.2). At a minimum follow-up of 2 years’ post diagnosis, the median survival of the group is 18.0 months (95% CI: 13.4 - 22.6 months). Conclusion: IMRT for GBM produces significant dosimetric advantages in relation to planning target volume and normal tissue dose compared with 3D conformal plans. The data also confirm the accuracy of IMRT technique for CNS with IGRT delivery utilising OBI demonstrating minimal deviation from planned to treated isocentre.
出处 《Journal of Cancer Therapy》 2013年第11期18-24,共7页 癌症治疗(英文)
关键词 INTENSITY MODULATED Radiation THERAPY GLIOBLASTOMA DOSIMETRY Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Glioblastoma Dosimetry
  • 相关文献

同被引文献23

  • 1Chen C, Damek D, Gaspar LE, et al. Phase I trial of hypofrac- tionated intensity -modulated radiotherapy with temozolomide chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma muhiforme [J]. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Bi- ology Physics, 2011,81 (4) : 1066 - 1074.
  • 2Massaccesi M, Ferro M, Cilla S, et al. Accelerated intensity - modulated radio - therapy plus temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma : a phase I dose - escalation study [ J ]. Internation- al journal of clinical oncology, 2013,18 ( 5 ) :784 - 791.
  • 3Grossman SA, Ye X, Chamberlain M, et al. Talampanel with standard radiation and temozolomide in patients with newly di- agnosed glioblastorna: a muhicenter phase Ⅱ trial [ J ]. Journal of Clinical Ontology ,2009,27 (25) :4155 - 4161.
  • 4Fadul CE, Fisher JL, Gui J, et al. Immune modulation effects of concomitant temozolomide and radiation therapy on peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with glioblastoma multi- forme [ J ]. Neuro - oncology ,2011,13 (4) : 393 - 400.
  • 5Cho KH, Kim JY, Lee SH, et al. Simultaneous integrated boost intensity - modulated radiotherapy in patients with high - grade gliomas [ J ]. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biolo- gy Physics,2010,78(2) :390 -397.
  • 6成慧,曾晓琴,黄燕梅,林富华.替莫唑胺治疗脑原发性恶性胶质瘤患者的护理[J].现代临床护理,2008,7(8):31-33. 被引量:12
  • 7李方明,聂青,徐世侠,杨平,于新,康静波,张丽萍,张军.高度恶性脑胶质瘤放疗联合替莫唑胺(国产)化疗临床研究[J].海军总医院学报,2009,22(1):6-9. 被引量:11
  • 8陈彦蓓,李任萍,郑敏.脑胶质瘤患者术后放疗的护理体会[J].昆明医学院学报,2009,30(3):147-148. 被引量:4
  • 9吴学勇,张玺炜,殷晓峰,赵子仪.替莫唑胺联合放疗治疗18例初诊高级别脑胶质瘤患者的临床观察[J].中国癌症杂志,2009,19(4):288-291. 被引量:6
  • 10李运智,孙明丽,张学勇,武素玲,修志红.恶性肿瘤化疗后骨髓抑制期应用无菌床的护理[J].中国全科医学,2009,12(19):1789-1791. 被引量:15

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部