期刊文献+

Identification of Hub Genes Associated with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prognosis by Bioinformatics Analysis

Identification of Hub Genes Associated with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prognosis by Bioinformatics Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 <strong>Objective:</strong><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> This study aimed to identify hub genes that are associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognosis by bioinformatics analysis. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Data were collected from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) liver HCC datasets. </span><a name="_Hlk11768117"></a><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The robust rank ag</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">gregation algorithm was used in integrating the data on differentially ex</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">pressed genes (DEGs). Online databases DAVID 6.8 and REACTOME were used for </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">gene ontology and pathway enrichment analysis. R software version 3.5.1, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Cytoscape, and Kaplan-Meier plotter were used to identify hub genes. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Six GEO datasets and the TCGA liver HCC dataset were included in this analysis. A total of 151 upregulated and 245 downregulated DEGs were iden</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tified. The upregulated DEGs most significantly enriched in the functional</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> categories of cell division, chromosomes, centromeric regions, and </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">protein binding, whereas the downregulated DEGs most significantly</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> enriched in the </span><a name="_Hlk11059934"></a><span style="font-family:Verdana;">epoxygenase P450 pathway, extracellular region, and heme binding, with respect to biological process, cellular component, and molecular function analysis, respectively. Upregulated DEGS most significantly enriched the cell cycle pathway, whereas downregulated DEGs most significantly enriched </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the metabolism pathway. Finally, 88 upregulated and 40 downregulated genes were </span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">identified as hub genes. The top 10 upregulated hub DEGs were </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">CDK</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1,</span></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CCNB</span></i><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CCNB</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CDC</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">20,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CCNA</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> AURKA</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> MAD</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">L</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> TOP</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> BUB</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">B </span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span></span><i> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">BUB</span></i><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1. The top 10 downregulated hub DEGs were </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ESR</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> IGF</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> FTCD</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CYP</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">4,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> SPP</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2,</span><i> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">C</span></i><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">8</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CYP</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">E</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> TAT</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> F</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">9 and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">CYP</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">9. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusions:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> This study identified</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> several upregulated and downregulated hub genes that are associated with the prognosis of HCC patients. Verification of these results using </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">in vitro</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">in vivo</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> studies is warranted.</span></span> <strong>Objective:</strong><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> This study aimed to identify hub genes that are associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognosis by bioinformatics analysis. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Data were collected from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) liver HCC datasets. </span><a name="_Hlk11768117"></a><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The robust rank ag</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">gregation algorithm was used in integrating the data on differentially ex</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">pressed genes (DEGs). Online databases DAVID 6.8 and REACTOME were used for </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">gene ontology and pathway enrichment analysis. R software version 3.5.1, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Cytoscape, and Kaplan-Meier plotter were used to identify hub genes. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Six GEO datasets and the TCGA liver HCC dataset were included in this analysis. A total of 151 upregulated and 245 downregulated DEGs were iden</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tified. The upregulated DEGs most significantly enriched in the functional</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> categories of cell division, chromosomes, centromeric regions, and </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">protein binding, whereas the downregulated DEGs most significantly</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> enriched in the </span><a name="_Hlk11059934"></a><span style="font-family:Verdana;">epoxygenase P450 pathway, extracellular region, and heme binding, with respect to biological process, cellular component, and molecular function analysis, respectively. Upregulated DEGS most significantly enriched the cell cycle pathway, whereas downregulated DEGs most significantly enriched </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the metabolism pathway. Finally, 88 upregulated and 40 downregulated genes were </span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">identified as hub genes. The top 10 upregulated hub DEGs were </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">CDK</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1,</span></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CCNB</span></i><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CCNB</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CDC</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">20,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CCNA</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> AURKA</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> MAD</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">L</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> TOP</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> BUB</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">B </span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span></span><i> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">BUB</span></i><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1. The top 10 downregulated hub DEGs were </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ESR</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> IGF</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> FTCD</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CYP</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">4,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> SPP</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2,</span><i> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">C</span></i><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">8</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CYP</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">E</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> TAT</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> F</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">9 and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">CYP</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">9. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusions:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> This study identified</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> several upregulated and downregulated hub genes that are associated with the prognosis of HCC patients. Verification of these results using </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">in vitro</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">in vivo</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> studies is warranted.</span></span>
作者 Xi Zhang Xiaojun Luo Wenbin Liu Ai Shen Xi Zhang;Xiaojun Luo;Wenbin Liu;Ai Shen(Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China)
出处 《Journal of Cancer Therapy》 2021年第4期186-207,共22页 癌症治疗(英文)
关键词 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Hub Genes BIOINFORMATICS Robust Rank Aggregation Differentially Expressed Genes Hepatocellular Carcinoma Hub Genes Bioinformatics Robust Rank Aggregation Differentially Expressed Genes
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献20

  • 1Arzumanyan Alla,Reis Helena M G P V,Feitelson Mark A.Pathogenic mechanisms in HBV- and HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature reviews. Cancer . 2013
  • 2Bernat Crosas.Deubiquitinating Enzyme Inhibitors and their Potential in Cancer Therapy[J]. Current Cancer Drug Targets . 2014 (6)
  • 3Neha Aggarwal,Bonnie F. Sloane.Cathepsin B: Multiple roles in cancer[J]. Prot. Clin. Appl. . 2014 (5-6)
  • 4Roberto J Fajardo,Lamya Karim,Virginia I Calley,Mary L Bouxsein.A Review of Rodent Models of Type 2 Diabetic Skeletal Fragility[J]. J Bone Miner Res . 2014 (5)
  • 5Pushpendra Singh,Jimi Marin Alex,Felix Bast.Insulin receptor (IR) and insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF-1R) signaling systems: novel treatment strategies for cancer[J]. Medical Oncology . 2014 (1)
  • 6Lisa J. Crawford,Alexandra E. Irvine.Targeting the ubiquitin proteasome system in haematological malignancies[J]. Blood Reviews . 2013 (6)
  • 7Anne Schreiber,Matthias Peter.Substrate recognition in selective autophagy and the ubiquitin–proteasome system[J]. BBA - Molecular Cell Research . 2013
  • 8Sara Sulpizio,Nicola Franceschini,Adriano Piattelli,Pierluigi Di Sebastiano,Paolo Innocenti,Federico Selvaggi.Cathepsins and pancreatic cancer: The 2012 update[J]. Pancreatology . 2012 (5)
  • 9Boris Gole,Peter C. Huszthy,Mara Popovi?,Jera Jeruc,Youssef S. Ardebili,Rolf Bjerkvig,Tamara T. Lah.The regulation of cysteine cathepsins and cystatins in human gliomas[J]. Int. J. Cancer . 2012 (8)
  • 10Reiser, Jochen,Adair, Brian,Reinheckel, Thomas.Specialized roles for cysteine cathepsins in health and disease[J]. Journal of Clinical Investigation . 2010 (10)

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部