期刊文献+

Evaluation of Bone Regeneration in Single Stage Closure of Cleft Alveolus with Gingivoperiosteoplasty

Evaluation of Bone Regeneration in Single Stage Closure of Cleft Alveolus with Gingivoperiosteoplasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 <strong>Background:</strong> <span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Cleft alveolus closure is a challenge for </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">cleft</span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">surgeon</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> for many decades. Secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) is the preferred technique using autologous cancellous </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ileac</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> crest bone as the donor graft. Many alternative methods were tried over the years with no</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">any</span></span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> promising results. Gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) is a good alternative surgical technique for bone regeneration in cleft alveolus with proper case selection criteria. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Aim:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Aim of the study was to evaluate the bone regeneration following </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">closure</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> of cleft alveolus with </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">gingivoperiosteoplasty</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Method: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">This study was carried out in the department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yenepoya Dental College, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India, from March 2018 to July 2019. In this </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">study</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> we have performed </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">gingivoperiosteoplasty</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> with palatoplasty and evaluated the amount of bone formation in the cleft alveolus using a series of </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">intra oral</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> periapical radiographs. Five patients who required surgical repair of unilateral cleft palate and alveolus were selected for the study. </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Clinical</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and radiographical assessment was done </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">post operatively</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, after three and six months respectively for anatomical function and bone formation. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> After completion of clinical studies on patients</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the statistical analysis of the data obtained. Radiographs were </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">analy</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">z</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ed</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> for </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">grey scale</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> density </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">by means of</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> adobe </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">photo shop</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">using</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the MATLAB process by histogram </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">comparison</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">in</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> three months and six months, </span><a name="_Hlk58658647"></a><span style="font-family:Verdana;">showing denser </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">grey scale</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> pattern, indicating the new bone formation in the cleft alveolus surgical site, in all the 5 surgical cases. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) is a good alternative procedure </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">to</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG), so donor site morbidity can be avoided with reduced time and cost for the surgery. But a larger sample size and longer follow-up </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">are</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> necessary to understand the better reliability of this surgical technique. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Clinical Significance: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Gingivoperiosteoplasty in cleft alveolus patients showed significant bone formation in 3 to 6 months postoperatively.</span></span> <strong>Background:</strong> <span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Cleft alveolus closure is a challenge for </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">cleft</span> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">surgeon</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> for many decades. Secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) is the preferred technique using autologous cancellous </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ileac</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> crest bone as the donor graft. Many alternative methods were tried over the years with no</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">any</span></span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> promising results. Gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) is a good alternative surgical technique for bone regeneration in cleft alveolus with proper case selection criteria. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Aim:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Aim of the study was to evaluate the bone regeneration following </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">closure</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> of cleft alveolus with </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">gingivoperiosteoplasty</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Method: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">This study was carried out in the department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yenepoya Dental College, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India, from March 2018 to July 2019. In this </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">study</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> we have performed </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">gingivoperiosteoplasty</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> with palatoplasty and evaluated the amount of bone formation in the cleft alveolus using a series of </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">intra oral</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> periapical radiographs. Five patients who required surgical repair of unilateral cleft palate and alveolus were selected for the study. </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Clinical</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and radiographical assessment was done </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">post operatively</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, after three and six months respectively for anatomical function and bone formation. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> After completion of clinical studies on patients</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the statistical analysis of the data obtained. Radiographs were </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">analy</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">z</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ed</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> for </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">grey scale</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> density </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">by means of</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> adobe </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">photo shop</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">using</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> the MATLAB process by histogram </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">comparison</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">in</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> three months and six months, </span><a name="_Hlk58658647"></a><span style="font-family:Verdana;">showing denser </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">grey scale</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> pattern, indicating the new bone formation in the cleft alveolus surgical site, in all the 5 surgical cases. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) is a good alternative procedure </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">to</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG), so donor site morbidity can be avoided with reduced time and cost for the surgery. But a larger sample size and longer follow-up </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">are</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> necessary to understand the better reliability of this surgical technique. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Clinical Significance: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Gingivoperiosteoplasty in cleft alveolus patients showed significant bone formation in 3 to 6 months postoperatively.</span></span>
作者 Vinayakrishna Kolari Joyce P. Sequiera Umer Hasoon Adil Iqbal Sait Vinayakrishna Kolari;Joyce P. Sequiera;Umer Hasoon;Adil Iqbal Sait(Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yenepoya Dental College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India;Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Santhi Hospital, Omasseri, Kozhikode, Kerala, India)
出处 《Open Journal of Pediatrics》 2020年第4期751-758,共8页 儿科学期刊(英文)
关键词 Gingivoperiosteoplasty Trabecular Pattern UNILATERAL Cleft Palate Gingivoperiosteoplasty Trabecular Pattern Unilateral Cleft Palate
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部