摘要
<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Objectives: </span></b></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Early identification of patients with the novel coronavirus in</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">duced-disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pneumonia is currently challenging.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Few data are available on validated scores predictive of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The Portuguese Society of Intensive Care (PSIC) proposed a risk score whose main goals were to predict a higher probability of COVID-19 and optimize hospital resources, adjusting patients’ intervention. This study aimed to validate the PSIC risk score applied to inpatients with pneumonia.</span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> A retrospective analysis of 207 patients with pneumonia admitted to a suspected/confirmed </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">SARS-CoV-2 infection specialized ward (20/03 to 20/05/2020) was per</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">formed. Score variables were analyzed to determine the significance of the indepen</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">dent predictive variables on the probability of a positive SARS-CoV-2</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> rRT-PCR test. The binary logistic regression modeling approach was selected. The best cut-off value was obtained with the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve together with the evaluation of the discriminatory power through the Area Under the Curve (AUC).</span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The validation cohort included</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">145 patients. Typical chest computed-tomography features (OR, 12.16;95%</span></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">CI, 3.32</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">44.50) and contact with a positive SARS-CoV-2 patient (OR, 6.56;95%</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">CI, 1.33</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">32.30) were the most significant independent predictive variables. A score ≥</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">10 increased suspicion for</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. The AUC</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">was</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.82 (</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">95%</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">CI, 0.73</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.91</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) demonstrating the good discriminating power for COVID-19 probability stratification in inpatients with pneumonia. </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusions: </span></b></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The application of the PSIC score to inpatients with pneumonia may be of value in predicting the risk of COVID-19.</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Further studies from other centers are needed to validate this score widely.
<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Objectives: </span></b></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Early identification of patients with the novel coronavirus in</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">duced-disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pneumonia is currently challenging.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Few data are available on validated scores predictive of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The Portuguese Society of Intensive Care (PSIC) proposed a risk score whose main goals were to predict a higher probability of COVID-19 and optimize hospital resources, adjusting patients’ intervention. This study aimed to validate the PSIC risk score applied to inpatients with pneumonia.</span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> A retrospective analysis of 207 patients with pneumonia admitted to a suspected/confirmed </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">SARS-CoV-2 infection specialized ward (20/03 to 20/05/2020) was per</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">formed. Score variables were analyzed to determine the significance of the indepen</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">dent predictive variables on the probability of a positive SARS-CoV-2</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> rRT-PCR test. The binary logistic regression modeling approach was selected. The best cut-off value was obtained with the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve together with the evaluation of the discriminatory power through the Area Under the Curve (AUC).</span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The validation cohort included</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">145 patients. Typical chest computed-tomography features (OR, 12.16;95%</span></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">CI, 3.32</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">44.50) and contact with a positive SARS-CoV-2 patient (OR, 6.56;95%</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">CI, 1.33</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">32.30) were the most significant independent predictive variables. A score ≥</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">10 increased suspicion for</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. The AUC</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">was</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.82 (</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">95%</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">CI, 0.73</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.91</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) demonstrating the good discriminating power for COVID-19 probability stratification in inpatients with pneumonia. </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusions: </span></b></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The application of the PSIC score to inpatients with pneumonia may be of value in predicting the risk of COVID-19.</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Further studies from other centers are needed to validate this score widely.