期刊文献+

Portuguese Society of Intensive Care Score for Predicting SARS-CoV-2 Infection Applied to Inpatients with Pneumonia: A Reliable Tool?

Portuguese Society of Intensive Care Score for Predicting SARS-CoV-2 Infection Applied to Inpatients with Pneumonia: A Reliable Tool?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 <b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Objectives: </span></b></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Early identification of patients with the novel coronavirus in</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">duced-disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pneumonia is currently challenging.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Few data are available on validated scores predictive of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The Portuguese Society of Intensive Care (PSIC) proposed a risk score whose main goals were to predict a higher probability of COVID-19 and optimize hospital resources, adjusting patients’ intervention. This study aimed to validate the PSIC risk score applied to inpatients with pneumonia.</span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> A retrospective analysis of 207 patients with pneumonia admitted to a suspected/confirmed </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">SARS-CoV-2 infection specialized ward (20/03 to 20/05/2020) was per</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">formed. Score variables were analyzed to determine the significance of the indepen</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">dent predictive variables on the probability of a positive SARS-CoV-2</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> rRT-PCR test. The binary logistic regression modeling approach was selected. The best cut-off value was obtained with the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve together with the evaluation of the discriminatory power through the Area Under the Curve (AUC).</span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The validation cohort included</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">145 patients. Typical chest computed-tomography features (OR, 12.16;95%</span></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">CI, 3.32</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">44.50) and contact with a positive SARS-CoV-2 patient (OR, 6.56;95%</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">CI, 1.33</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">32.30) were the most significant independent predictive variables. A score ≥</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">10 increased suspicion for</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. The AUC</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">was</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.82 (</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">95%</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">CI, 0.73</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.91</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) demonstrating the good discriminating power for COVID-19 probability stratification in inpatients with pneumonia. </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusions: </span></b></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The application of the PSIC score to inpatients with pneumonia may be of value in predicting the risk of COVID-19.</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Further studies from other centers are needed to validate this score widely. <b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Objectives: </span></b></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Early identification of patients with the novel coronavirus in</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">duced-disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pneumonia is currently challenging.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Few data are available on validated scores predictive of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The Portuguese Society of Intensive Care (PSIC) proposed a risk score whose main goals were to predict a higher probability of COVID-19 and optimize hospital resources, adjusting patients’ intervention. This study aimed to validate the PSIC risk score applied to inpatients with pneumonia.</span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> A retrospective analysis of 207 patients with pneumonia admitted to a suspected/confirmed </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">SARS-CoV-2 infection specialized ward (20/03 to 20/05/2020) was per</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">formed. Score variables were analyzed to determine the significance of the indepen</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">dent predictive variables on the probability of a positive SARS-CoV-2</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> rRT-PCR test. The binary logistic regression modeling approach was selected. The best cut-off value was obtained with the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve together with the evaluation of the discriminatory power through the Area Under the Curve (AUC).</span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The validation cohort included</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">145 patients. Typical chest computed-tomography features (OR, 12.16;95%</span></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">CI, 3.32</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">44.50) and contact with a positive SARS-CoV-2 patient (OR, 6.56;95%</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">CI, 1.33</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">32.30) were the most significant independent predictive variables. A score ≥</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">10 increased suspicion for</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. The AUC</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">was</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.82 (</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">95%</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">CI, 0.73</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.91</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) demonstrating the good discriminating power for COVID-19 probability stratification in inpatients with pneumonia. </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusions: </span></b></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The application of the PSIC score to inpatients with pneumonia may be of value in predicting the risk of COVID-19.</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Further studies from other centers are needed to validate this score widely.
作者 Ana Alfaiate David Noivo Vera Clérigo Vera Durão Fernando Durão Margarida Castanho Susana Sousa Lígia Fernandes Paula Duarte Ana Alfaiate;David Noivo;Vera Clérigo;Vera Durão;Fernando Durão;Margarida Castanho;Susana Sousa;Lígia Fernandes;Paula Duarte(COVID-19 Service, Pulmonology Department, Setúbal Hospital Center, Setúbal, Portugal;DECivil/CERENA, Técnico Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal)
机构地区 COVID- DECivil/CERENA
出处 《Open Journal of Respiratory Diseases》 2021年第2期49-60,共12页 呼吸病期刊(英文)
关键词 SARS-CoV-2 Infection COVID-19 PNEUMONIA Risk Score SARS-CoV-2 Infection COVID-19 Pneumonia Risk Score
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部