期刊文献+

Doctor-reported hospital management of acute coronary syndrome in China: A nationwide survey of 1029 hospitals in 30 provinces 被引量:3

Doctor-reported hospital management of acute coronary syndrome in China: A nationwide survey of 1029 hospitals in 30 provinces
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Background: Despite recent improvements in the hospital treatment of ACS, little is known about current cardiological practice in China or use of evidence-based approach in Chinese hospitals. Methods: A questionnaire about doctor-reported hospital management of ACS was posted to the head of the cardiology department of 1397 hospitals across 30 provinces of China. Reported use of various clinical procedures and treatments were analysed and compared between different types of hospital. Results: Of the 1029 (74%) hospitals that responded, 43% were tier III (tertiary) hospitals. For STEMI, primary PCI was used as the main reperfusion therapy by 50.2% of tier III and 9.3% of tier II/I (secondary) hospitals. Most of hospitals also used various proven therapy routinely for STEMI and NSTEMI/UA, including anti-platelet therapy (98% and 93%), anticoagulant (96% and 90%), statin (97% and 94%), oral β-blockers (87% and 86%) and ACE-I (88% and 83%). However, certain therapies with little or no proven value (eg, G.I.K., magnesium and Chinese tradition medicine) remained used routinely by 25% - 40% of tier II/I hospitals. After discharge, statin, antiplatelet, β-blockers and ACE-I were reportedly used routinely by 85% - 95% of the responders for secondary prevention. Conclusions: With a few exceptions, doctor-reported hospital management of ACS in China is largely consistent with that recommended by current guidelines. Large nationwide registries are needed to assess long-term adherence to treatments after hospital discharge. Background: Despite recent improvements in the hospital treatment of ACS, little is known about current cardiological practice in China or use of evidence-based approach in Chinese hospitals. Methods: A questionnaire about doctor-reported hospital management of ACS was posted to the head of the cardiology department of 1397 hospitals across 30 provinces of China. Reported use of various clinical procedures and treatments were analysed and compared between different types of hospital. Results: Of the 1029 (74%) hospitals that responded, 43% were tier III (tertiary) hospitals. For STEMI, primary PCI was used as the main reperfusion therapy by 50.2% of tier III and 9.3% of tier II/I (secondary) hospitals. Most of hospitals also used various proven therapy routinely for STEMI and NSTEMI/UA, including anti-platelet therapy (98% and 93%), anticoagulant (96% and 90%), statin (97% and 94%), oral β-blockers (87% and 86%) and ACE-I (88% and 83%). However, certain therapies with little or no proven value (eg, G.I.K., magnesium and Chinese tradition medicine) remained used routinely by 25% - 40% of tier II/I hospitals. After discharge, statin, antiplatelet, β-blockers and ACE-I were reportedly used routinely by 85% - 95% of the responders for secondary prevention. Conclusions: With a few exceptions, doctor-reported hospital management of ACS in China is largely consistent with that recommended by current guidelines. Large nationwide registries are needed to assess long-term adherence to treatments after hospital discharge.
出处 《World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases》 2012年第3期168-176,共9页 心血管病(英文)
关键词 ACS IN-HOSPITAL TREATMENTS SECONDARY Prevention General Management China ACS In-Hospital Treatments Secondary Prevention General Management China
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献51

  • 1于丽天,朱俊,Rebecca Mister,章晏,李建冬,王多劳,刘力生,Marcus Flather.我国部分医院ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征再灌注治疗登记研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(7):593-597. 被引量:30
  • 2中国成人血脂异常防治指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(5):390-419. 被引量:5233
  • 3Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction-executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coil Cardiol, 2004,44: 671-719.
  • 4Smith SC Jr, Allen J, Blair SN, et al. AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update: endorsed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Circulation, 2006, 113 : 2363-2372.
  • 5Hasdai D, Behar S, Wallentin L, et al. A prospective survey of the characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Europe and the mediterranean basin. The survey of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J, 2002, 23:1190- 1201.
  • 6Carruthers KF, Dabbous OH, Flather MD, et al. Contemporary management of acute coronary syndromes : does the practice match the evidence? The global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE). Heart, 2005, 91: 290-298.
  • 7Peterson ED, Roe MT, Mulgund J, et al. Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA, 2006, 295: 1912-1920.
  • 8饶克勤.中国卫生统计年鉴2005.北京:协和医科大学出版社,2006:3-15.
  • 9Newby LK, LaPointe NM, Chen AY, et al. Long-term adherence to evidence-based secondary prevention therapies in coronary artery disease. Circulation, 2006, 113: 203-212.
  • 10[1]Second Chinese Cardiac Study (CCS-2) Collaborative Group. Rational, design and organization of the Second Chinese Cardiac Study (CCS-2): A randomized trial of clopidogrel plus aspirin, and of metoprolol, among patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Risk,2000,7:435-441.

共引文献204

同被引文献10

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部